MHB Dale's questions via Facebook about Riemann Sums

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating Riemann sums and their associated errors for a function defined over a specified interval. The calculations demonstrate that with a given width of rectangles, the area approximated using Riemann sums results in a value of 66/25 units², while the exact area calculated through integration is 8/3 units². The error between these two values is found to be -2/75, leading to a percentage error of -1%. Additionally, for a cubic function, the approximation using 100 rectangles yields a very small percentage error of 0.005%, indicating high accuracy. The thread emphasizes the relationship between Riemann sums and definite integrals in estimating areas under curves.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
View attachment 7140
View attachment 7141

(a) Since a = 2, that means $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \Delta x = \frac{2}{5} \end{align*}$

(b)
$\displaystyle \begin{align*} f \left( \frac{7\,\Delta x}{2} \right) &= f \left( \frac{7}{5} \right) \\ &= \left( \frac{7}{5} \right) ^2 \\ &= \frac{49}{25} \end{align*}$

(c)
$\displaystyle \begin{align*} A_4 &= f \left( \frac{7}{5} \right) \cdot \Delta x \\ &= \frac{49}{25} \cdot \frac{2}{5} \\ &= \frac{98}{125} \,\textrm{units}^2 \end{align*}$

(d)
$\displaystyle \begin{align*} A_i &= f \left( x_i \right) \cdot \Delta x \end{align*}$

(e)
$\displaystyle \begin{align*} S_5 &= \sum_{i = 1}^5{ \left[ f \left( x_i \right) \cdot \Delta x \right] } \\ &= f \left( x_1 \right) \cdot \Delta x + f \left( x_2 \right) \cdot \Delta x + f \left( x_3 \right) \cdot \Delta x + f \left( x_4 \right) \cdot \Delta x + f \left( x_5 \right) \cdot \Delta x \\ &= \left( \frac{1}{5} \right) ^2 \cdot \frac{2}{5} + \left( \frac{3}{5} \right) ^2 \cdot \frac{2}{5} + \left( \frac{5}{5} \right) ^2 \cdot \frac{2}{5} + \left( \frac{7}{5} \right) ^2 \cdot \frac{2}{5} + \left( \frac{9}{5} \right) ^2 \cdot \frac{2}{5} \\ &= \frac{1}{25} \cdot \frac{2}{5} + \frac{9}{25} \cdot \frac{2}{5} + \frac{25}{25} \cdot \frac{2}{5} + \frac{49}{25} \cdot \frac{2}{5} + \frac{81}{25} \cdot \frac{2}{5} \\ &= \frac{2}{125} + \frac{18}{125} + \frac{50}{125} + \frac{98}{125} + \frac{162}{125} \\ &= \frac{330}{125} \\ &= \frac{66}{25} \,\textrm{units}^2 \end{align*}$

(f)
$\displaystyle \begin{align*} A &= \int_0^a{f\left( x \right) \,\mathrm{d}x} \\ &= \int_0^2{ x^2\,\mathrm{d}x } \\ &= \left[ \frac{x^3}{3} \right] _0^2 \\ &= \frac{2^3}{3} - \frac{0^3}{3} \\ &= \frac{8}{3} \,\textrm{units}^2 \end{align*}$

(g)
$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \textrm{Error} &= \frac{66}{25} - \frac{8}{3} \\ &= \frac{198}{75} - \frac{200}{75} \\ &= -\frac{2}{75} \end{align*}$

So the percentage error is

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{-\frac{2}{75}}{\frac{8}{3}} \cdot 100\% &= -\frac{2}{75} \cdot \frac{3}{8} \cdot 100\% \\ &= -\frac{600\%}{600} \\ &= -1\% \end{align*}$
 

Attachments

  • part 1.jpg
    part 1.jpg
    38.7 KB · Views: 123
  • part 2.jpg
    part 2.jpg
    19.6 KB · Views: 114
Mathematics news on Phys.org
View attachment 7142

(a) Since the distance along the x-axis is "b" and it is being divided into "n" rectangles, that means $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \Delta x = \frac{b}{n} \end{align*}$.

(b) Each interval can be written as $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left[ \left( i - 1 \right) \Delta x , i\,\Delta x \right] \end{align*}$, so that means the midpoint of each interval is

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} x_i &= \frac{\left( i - 1 \right) \Delta x + i\,\Delta x}{2} \\ &= \frac{\left( i - 1 + i \right) \Delta x}{2} \\ &= \frac{\left( 2\,i - 1 \right) \Delta x}{2} \end{align*}$

View attachment 7144

(c) Since we have found $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \Delta x = \frac{b}{n} \end{align*}$ that means

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} x_i &= \frac{\left( 2\,i - 1 \right) \Delta x}{2} \\ &= \frac{\left( 2\,i - 1 \right) \frac{b}{n}}{2} \\ &= \left( 2\,i - 1 \right) \frac{b}{2\,n} \end{align*}$

(d) The length of each rectangle is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \Delta x \end{align*}$ and the width is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} g \left( x_i \right) \end{align*}$ so the area of each rectangle is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A_i = g \left( x_i \right) \Delta x \end{align*}$

(e) Since $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x_i = \left( 2\,i - 1 \right) \frac{b}{2\,n} \end{align*}$ that means $\displaystyle \begin{align*} g \left( x_i \right) = g \left( \left( 2\,i - 1 \right) \frac{b}{2\,n} \right) \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \Delta x = \frac{b}{n} \end{align*}$ that means $\displaystyle \begin{align*} g \left( \left( 2\,i - 1 \right) \frac{b}{2\,n} \right) \frac{b}{n} = g \left( x_i \right) \Delta x \end{align*}$, so

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum_{i = 1}^n{ \left[ g\left( \left( 2\,i - 1 \right) \frac{b}{2\,n}\right) \Delta x \right] } &= \sum_{i = 1}^n{ \left[ g \left( x_i \right) \Delta x \right] } \\ &= \sum_{i = 1}^n{A_i} \end{align*}$

(f) (i) If $\displaystyle \begin{align*} g \left( x \right) = x^3 \end{align*}$, that means

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum_{i = 1}^n{ A_i } &= \sum_{i = 1}^n{ \left[ g \left( \left( 2\,i - 1 \right) \frac{b}{2\,n} \right) \Delta x \right] } \\ &= \sum_{i = 1}^n{ \left\{ \left[ \left( 2\,i - 1 \right) \frac{b}{2\,n} \right] ^3 \,\frac{b}{n} \right\} } \end{align*}$

so when $\displaystyle \begin{align*} n = 100 \end{align*}$ we have

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum_{i = 1}^{100}{ \left\{ \left[ \left( 2\,i - 1 \right) \frac{b}{100}\right] ^3\,\frac{b}{100} \right\} } &= \frac{19\,999\,b^4}{80\,000} \end{align*}$

Wolfram|Alpha: Computational Knowledge Engine

(ii)
$\displaystyle \begin{align*} A &= \lim_{n \to \infty}{ \left\{ \left[ \left( 2\,i - 1 \right) \frac{b}{n} \right] ^3 \,\frac{b}{n} \right\} } \\ &= \frac{b^4}{4} \end{align*}$

Wolfram|Alpha: Computational Knowledge Engine

View attachment 7145(g) The exact area under the curve $\displaystyle \begin{align*} g(x) = x^3 \end{align*}$ between x = 0 and x = b is

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} A &= \int_0^b{x^3\,\mathrm{d}x} &= \left[ \frac{x^4}{4} \right] _0^b \\ &= \frac{b^4}{4} - \frac{0^4}{4} \\ &= \frac{b^4}{4} \,\textrm{units}^2 \end{align*}$

(i) so the error in using 100 rectangles for the approximation is

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{b^4}{4} - \frac{19\,999\,b^4}{80\,000} &= \frac{20\,000\,b^4}{80\,000} - \frac{19\,999\,b^4}{80\,000} \\ &= \frac{b^4}{80\,000} \end{align*}$

and so the percentage error is

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\frac{b^4}{80\,000}}{\frac{b^4}{4}} \cdot 100\% &= \frac{b^4}{80\,000} \cdot \frac{4}{b^4} \cdot 100\% \\ &= \frac{100\%}{20\,000} \\ &= 0.005\% \end{align*}$

(ii) and as the limiting value is exactly equal to the integral value, the percentage error is 0%.
 

Attachments

  • part 3.jpg
    part 3.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 130
  • part 4.jpg
    part 4.jpg
    37.7 KB · Views: 115
  • part 4.jpg
    part 4.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 123
  • part 5.jpg
    part 5.jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 127
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
11K
Back
Top