I Dark energy contributing to, or modifying, mass estimates?

AI Thread Summary
Dark energy is suggested to increase the potential energy in gravitationally bound systems, leading to higher virial mass estimates. This increase in mass estimates is attributed to dark energy acting as a repulsive force, making systems less tightly bound and thus increasing their overall mass. While the effect of dark energy on mass estimates is negligible for smaller systems like the solar system, it may be measurable in larger systems such as the Local Group of galaxies. The presence of a cosmological constant is specifically noted to enhance mass estimates due to this potential energy increase. Overall, dark energy plays a significant role in modifying mass estimates in cosmological contexts.
Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR Summary
Dark energy contributing to, or modifying, mass estimates?
I have found some papers (like this one: https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2009/45/aa12762-09/aa12762-09.html) which say that dark energy increases the potential energy in a system of a quasi-stationary gravitationally bound many-body system.

It also says that because of this, the virial mass estimate also increases with dark energy.

And also in this other paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.14963) it is said that the presence of a cosmological constant (dark energy) increases the estimate of the mass of the Local Group. Is this because of an increase in the potential energy (as in the previous case)?

Does dark energy increase mass estimates by increasing the potential energy of the system?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
Does dark energy increase mass estimates by increasing the potential energy of the system?
In principle, yes. Heuristically, you can think of it as adding a small repulsive potential energy, so that the system is slightly less tightly bound than it would be in the absence of dark energy, and so has a slightly larger mass (because the system's mass gets larger as it gets less tightly bound--the net binding energy is a negative contribution to the mass).

In practice, for systems like our solar system, the effect is too small to measure. The papers you reference appear to be estimating the effect for the Local Group of galaxies, which is just large enough that the effect might be measurable in the data.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?
Back
Top