I Dark energy contributing to, or modifying, mass estimates?

AI Thread Summary
Dark energy is suggested to increase the potential energy in gravitationally bound systems, leading to higher virial mass estimates. This increase in mass estimates is attributed to dark energy acting as a repulsive force, making systems less tightly bound and thus increasing their overall mass. While the effect of dark energy on mass estimates is negligible for smaller systems like the solar system, it may be measurable in larger systems such as the Local Group of galaxies. The presence of a cosmological constant is specifically noted to enhance mass estimates due to this potential energy increase. Overall, dark energy plays a significant role in modifying mass estimates in cosmological contexts.
Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR Summary
Dark energy contributing to, or modifying, mass estimates?
I have found some papers (like this one: https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2009/45/aa12762-09/aa12762-09.html) which say that dark energy increases the potential energy in a system of a quasi-stationary gravitationally bound many-body system.

It also says that because of this, the virial mass estimate also increases with dark energy.

And also in this other paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.14963) it is said that the presence of a cosmological constant (dark energy) increases the estimate of the mass of the Local Group. Is this because of an increase in the potential energy (as in the previous case)?

Does dark energy increase mass estimates by increasing the potential energy of the system?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
Does dark energy increase mass estimates by increasing the potential energy of the system?
In principle, yes. Heuristically, you can think of it as adding a small repulsive potential energy, so that the system is slightly less tightly bound than it would be in the absence of dark energy, and so has a slightly larger mass (because the system's mass gets larger as it gets less tightly bound--the net binding energy is a negative contribution to the mass).

In practice, for systems like our solar system, the effect is too small to measure. The papers you reference appear to be estimating the effect for the Local Group of galaxies, which is just large enough that the effect might be measurable in the data.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top