Dark Energy Evolution: Is $\Lambda$CDM Model the Best?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evaluation of the $\Lambda$CDM model in light of recent findings regarding dark energy evolution. Researchers Xuheng Ding, Marek Biesiada, Shuo Cao, Zhengxiang Li, and Zong-Hong Zhu analyzed a comprehensive dataset of 29 $H(z)$ measurements, revealing a significant discrepancy between these measurements and those from BAO/CMB data. This discrepancy supports previous claims by Sahni, Shafielo o, and Starobinsky (2014) that the $\Lambda$CDM model may not accurately describe the universe, particularly due to differing redshift distributions in the measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the $\Lambda$CDM model in cosmology
  • Familiarity with Hubble parameter measurements ($H(z)$)
  • Knowledge of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data
  • Experience with statistical analysis methods, including weighted mean and median
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of dark energy evolution on cosmological models
  • Study the Om diagnostic and its application in cosmology
  • Explore the differences between differential age (DA) measurements and BAO/CMB measurements
  • Investigate alternative cosmological models beyond $\Lambda$CDM
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, astrophysicists, and researchers interested in the dynamics of dark energy and the validity of cosmological models.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
Is Dark Energy a constant ?

arXiv:1503.04923 [pdf, ps, other]
Is there evidence for dark energy evolution?
Xuheng Ding, Marek Biesiada, Shuo Cao, Zhengxiang Li, Zong-Hong Zhu
Comments: 8 pages, 2 figures. Accepted for publication in the ApJL
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)

Recently, Sahni, Shafielo o & Starobinsky (2014) combined two independent measurements of $H(z)$ from BAO data with the value of the Hubble constant $H_0 = H(z=0)$, in order to test the cosmological constant hypothesis by means of an improved version of the $Om$ diagnostic. Their result indicated a considerable tension between observations and predictions of the $\Lambda$CDM model. However, such strong conclusion was based only on three measurements of $H(z)$. This motivated us to repeat similar work on a larger sample. By using a comprehensive data set of 29 $H(z)$, we find that discrepancy indeed exists. Even though the value of $\Omega_{m,0} h^2$ inferred from $Omh^2$ diagnostic depends on the way one chooses to make a summary statistics (weighted mean or the median), the persisting discrepancy supports the claims of Sahni, Shafielo o & Starobinsky (2014) that $\Lambda$CDM model may not be the best description of our Universe.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pablo Marcel
Space news on Phys.org
Seems to me that what they're really showing is a significant discrepancy between the differential age (DA) measurements and the BAO/CMB measurements. This will naturally show up as a deviation from a cosmological constant as long as the DA measurements have a different redshift distribution than the BAO measurements (which they do).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K