Dark energy expansion and the Hubble diagram

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Hubble diagram, which plots recession velocity against distance for distant galaxies, demonstrating a linear relationship defined by the Hubble constant. Despite observations of extremely distant galaxies exhibiting higher velocities due to dark energy, the linearity of the Hubble diagram remains intact for redshifts z << 1. This linearity is a consequence of Hubble's law, which is derived from a Taylor expansion of a more complex expression that can be computed using the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) model.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hubble's law and the Hubble constant
  • Familiarity with redshift concepts in cosmology
  • Knowledge of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) model
  • Basic grasp of Taylor series expansions in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of dark energy on cosmic expansion
  • Learn about the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) model in detail
  • Explore advanced concepts in cosmology related to redshift and distance measurements
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of Taylor series expansions in physics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the dynamics of cosmic expansion and the effects of dark energy on the universe's structure.

Froglet
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I understand that a Hubble diagram is a graph of recession velocity plotted against distance for distant galaxies, and shows a linear relationship. The Hubble constant is the gradient of the graph.

We are now observing extremely distant galaxies with greater than expected velocities due to 'dark energy'. Does this mean that if we plotted these galaxies on a Hubble diagram, the graph we plot would no longer be linear, and the gradient would become steeper the further out we go?

Thanks.
 
Space news on Phys.org
No, it will still be almost as linear as before. Hubble's law holds anyway only for redshifts z << 1, as it is essentially a Taylor expansion of a more complicated expression, which you can compute easily using the standard FRW model.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K