MHB Darshit P's question at Yahoo Answers regarding conservation of energy

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum speed a 200g puck needs to reach the top of a 3.7m frictionless ramp inclined at 26 degrees, the conservation of energy principle is applied. The initial kinetic energy of the puck is equated to the gravitational potential energy at the height of the ramp. The formula derived is v_i = √(2gLsin(θ)), where g is the acceleration due to gravity, L is the length of the ramp, and θ is the angle of inclination. Substituting the values results in a minimum speed of approximately 5.64 m/s. This calculation provides a clear solution to the physics problem posed.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

I need help in physics!?

What minimum speed does a 200g puck need to make it to the top of a 3.7m -long, 26 degrees frictionless ramp?

Here is a link to the question:

I need help in physics!? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Darshit P,

Initially the puck has kinetic energy, and finally it has gravitational potential energy, and since only conservative forces are at work, we may equate the two:

$$\frac{1}{2}mv_i^2=mgh$$

Multiply through by $$\frac{2}{m}$$:

$$v_i^2=2gh$$

Take the positive root since we are asked for speed:

$$v_i=\sqrt{2gh}$$

Now, we need to know the height $h$ of the ramp. Let $L$ be the length of the ramp and $\theta$ be the angle of inclination. From the definition of the sine function, we may state:

$$\sin(\theta)=\frac{h}{L}\,\therefore\,h=L \sin(\theta)$$

and so we have:

$$v_i=\sqrt{2gL\sin(\theta)}$$

Now, plugging in the given and known data, we find:

$$v_i=\sqrt{2\left(9.8\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2} \right)(3.7\text{ m})\sin\left(26^{\circ} \right)}\approx5.64\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}}$$

To Darshit P and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other algebra based physics problems in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f22/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top