27Thousand
- 109
- 0
DaveC426913 said:No, it wasn't accidental. I got your meaning; I just chose to repurpose it.
OK, there is absolutely no middle ground on this one. There are exactly three ways of interpreting the above:
1] The writer has said it firmly tongue-in-cheek, as a joke, because it's ridiculous.
2] The writer is a troll, saying it only to get a rise, because it's ridiculous.
3] The writer is dead serious and thus has a very serious socializing disorder.
It is one of the three.
Consider this, I want to learn how to flirt. I hear men say that they don't ask women on dates unless they "feel it", and women say they send men hints whether the man is aware of it or not. I hear women say they wish men who they're not interested in would just leave them alone, while those they are interested in should be more courageous and just "ask the woman out".
Someone suggested to me that reading whether someone's friendly, bored, flirtatious, etc is a good idea to increase chances. Then a woman on Yahoo! Answers told me to try flirting with women and see how they respond back, to get an idea of whether they're interested.
So then I came across resources saying that historians believe mathematical models is what set Galileo and Newton apart from most others who were interested in the natural world, even if they were criticized for it. If I get a hold of data sets from peer-review flirting studies, perhaps I could look for patterns even if nothing's 100%? If it helps make me more confident and be myself, if I can know who's going to be receptive, so that I don't have to stress out thinking of it and rather focus on those who are interested?
I mean, if I can just make it conceptual in my head how to tell who's receptive and not after I start talking to someone, then perhaps it may help?