Dating Methods: Uncovering Earth's History

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArmitageT1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the methods used to date geological objects, particularly fossils, and the scientific basis for determining the age of the Earth and its inhabitants. Key techniques mentioned include carbon-14 dating, which is effective for dating organic materials up to 65,000 years, and radiometric methods such as Potassium-Argon dating, which can date rocks millions to billions of years old. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding radioactive decay and the assumptions involved in these dating methods, countering misconceptions about the Earth's age.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radiometric dating techniques, specifically Potassium-Argon dating.
  • Knowledge of carbon-14 dating and its limitations.
  • Familiarity with radioactive decay and isotope ratios.
  • Basic grasp of geological time scales and the history of Earth.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Potassium-Argon dating and its applications in geology.
  • Explore the limitations and assumptions of carbon-14 dating in paleontology.
  • Study other radiometric dating methods such as Uranium-Lead and Rubidium-Strontium dating.
  • Investigate the geological time scale and major events in Earth's history.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for geology students, educators, paleontologists, and anyone interested in understanding the scientific methods used to date fossils and geological formations.

ArmitageT1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm new here and have a rather simple question... how are objects in the Earth's crust, such as fossils, dated? I understand that 40,000-65,000 years is the average availability of years that certain organic materials can be dated with carbon-14 dating, so how are numbers of years such as the arrival of the dinosaurs 250 million years ago discovered?

This is a topic my uncle and I frequently argue on. He's a fundamentalist Christian and states the Earth is around 10,000 years old (something I get nearly furious with every time we discuss the issue) and of course this statement isn't based on science, but I wouldn't know how to respond if he asked me HOW we know that dinosaurs first walked the Earth 250 million years ago.

I apologize if this is an extremely mundane topic for most of you (I imagine it is) and that if it gets in the way of many more complex issues.

Thanks,
C.J.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Welcome, C.J. Don't worry about asking. We have to start somewhere of course, anyway I think you might want to read this paper very carefully

http://www.asa3.org/aSA/resources/Wiens.html
 
Last edited:
Thanks

Andre said:
Welcome, C.J. Don't worry about asking. We have to start somewhere of course, anyway I think you might want to read this paper very carefully

http://www.asa3.org/aSA/resources/Wiens.html

Thank you very much for the link. This explains a lot.
 
ArmitageT1 said:
Hi all,

I'm new here and have a rather simple question... how are objects in the Earth's crust, such as fossils, dated? I understand that 40,000-65,000 years is the average availability of years that certain organic materials can be dated with carbon-14 dating, so how are numbers of years such as the arrival of the dinosaurs 250 million years ago discovered?

This is a topic my uncle and I frequently argue on. He's a fundamentalist Christian and states the Earth is around 10,000 years old (something I get nearly furious with every time we discuss the issue) and of course this statement isn't based on science, but I wouldn't know how to respond if he asked me HOW we know that dinosaurs first walked the Earth 250 million years ago.

I apologize if this is an extremely mundane topic for most of you (I imagine it is) and that if it gets in the way of many more complex issues.

Thanks,
C.J.
The answer is simple, Potassium-Argon Dating
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potassium_argon_dating
 
The following quoted text is from this article: http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/carbon_dating.asp"

This is the basis for your Uncle's argument.

There are various other radiometric dating methods used today to give ages of millions or billions of years for rocks. These techniques, unlike carbon dating, mostly use the relative concentrations of parent and daughter products in radioactive decay chains. For example, potassium-40 decays to argon-40; uranium-238 decays to lead-206 via other elements like radium; uranium-235 decays to lead-207; rubidium-87 decays to strontium-87; etc. These techniques are applied to igneous rocks, and are normally seen as giving the time since solidification.

The isotope concentrations can be measured very accurately, but isotope concentrations are not dates. To derive ages from such measurements, unprovable assumptions have to be made such as:

1. The starting conditions are known (for example, that there was no daughter isotope present at the start, or that we know how much was there).

2. Decay rates have always been constant.

3. Systems were closed or isolated so that no parent or daughter isotopes were lost or added.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Weell obviously isotope ratios are the answer. But it's interesting to note that some christian scientists propose that god (or some other mighty force) sped up the decay rates to give the illusion that these things are older.

Clutching at straws if you ask me, but it's something your uncle might say.
 
Please change the thread title, it's false advertisment! Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K