MHB Dc 8t14 product to sum indentity

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dc Product Sum
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
4Use the power to sum formula to simplify the expression

$\frac{\sin\left({3\theta}\right)+\sin\left({5\theta}\right)}
{\cos\left({3\theta}\right)+\cos\left({5\theta}\right)}$

The answer is $\tan(4\theta)$

$$\sin\left({3\theta}\right)+\sin\left({5\theta}\right)
=2\sin\left({\frac{3\theta+5\theta}{2}}\right)\cos\left({\frac{3\theta-5\theta}{2 }}\right)$$

$$\cos\left({3\theta}\right)+\cos\left({5\theta}\right)
=2\cos\left({\frac{3\theta+5\theta}{2}}\right)\cos\left({\frac{3\theta-5\theta}{2 }}\right)$$

Hopefully I'm going in the right direction... But couldn't get the answer earlier
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We are given:

$$\frac{\sin(3\theta)+\sin(5\theta)}{\cos(3\theta)+\cos(5\theta)}$$

We have the following two applicable sum to product formulas:

$$\sin(x)+\sin(y)=2\sin\left(\frac{x+y}{2}\right)\cos\left(\frac{x-y}{2}\right)$$

$$\cos(x)+\cos(y)=2\cos\left(\frac{x+y}{2}\right)\cos\left(\frac{x-y}{2}\right)$$

So, how can we use these to rewrite the given expression?

edit: I see you've now edited your post and have the correct identities. So, using what you've written, we would have:

$$\frac{\sin(3\theta)+\sin(5\theta)}{\cos(3\theta)+\cos(5\theta)}=\frac{2\sin\left(\frac{3\theta+5\theta}{2}\right)\cos\left(\frac{3\theta-5\theta}{2}\right)}{2\cos\left(\frac{3\theta+5\theta}{2}\right)\cos\left(\frac{3\theta-5\theta}{2}\right)}$$

Now, just simplify. :)
 
$$\frac{2\sin\left({4\theta}\right)\cos\left({-\theta}\right)}
{2\cos\left({4\theta}\right)\cos\left({-\theta}\right)}
=\frac{\sin\left({4\theta}\right)}{\cos\left({4\theta}\right)}=\tan\left({4\theta}\right)$$
 
karush said:
$$\frac{2\sin\left({4\theta}\right)\cos\left({-\theta}\right)}
{2\cos\left({4\theta}\right)\cos\left({-\theta}\right)}
=\frac{\sin\left({4\theta}\right)}{\cos\left({4\theta}\right)}=\tan\left({4\theta}\right)$$

Well, $3\theta-5\theta=-2\theta$ and the using the identity $\cos(-x)=\cos(x)$ you would have $\cos(2\theta)$ in the numerator and denominator, but I wouldn't even bother with that...I would write:

$$\frac{\sin(3\theta)+\sin(5\theta)}{\cos(3\theta)+\cos(5\theta)}=\frac{\cancel{2}\sin\left(\frac{3\theta+5\theta}{2}\right)\cancel{\cos\left(\frac{3\theta-5\theta}{2}\right)}}{\cancel{2}\cos\left(\frac{3\theta+5\theta}{2}\right)\cancel{\cos\left(\frac{3\theta-5\theta}{2}\right)}}$$

$$\frac{\sin(3\theta)+\sin(5\theta)}{\cos(3\theta)+\cos(5\theta)}=\frac{\sin\left(\frac{8\theta}{2}\right)}{\cos\left(\frac{8\theta}{2}\right)}$$

$$\frac{\sin(3\theta)+\sin(5\theta)}{\cos(3\theta)+\cos(5\theta)}=\frac{\sin\left(4\theta\right)}{\cos\left(4\theta\right)}=\tan(4\theta)$$
 
Well, that was helpful, didn't see that, Nice thing about MHB, learn shortcuts
How do you do the strike through? (Cool)​
 
karush said:
Well, that was helpful, didn't see that, Nice thing about MHB, learn shortcuts
How do you do the strike through? (Cool)​

You can use the \cancel command...there is also the \xcancel{} command which will x out a factor. Both of these can be found in our Qucik $\LaTeX$ element in the "Algebra" section.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
933
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top