DeBroglie wavelength of Proton in H atom

In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of the de Broglie wavelength of a proton in a hydrogen atom, as well as the relevance of the Bohr model and energy eigenstates in this calculation. However, it is mentioned that the concept of de Broglie wavelength is outdated and not applicable to complex systems such as the hydrogen atom.
  • #1
Davephaelon
134
21
How would one calculate the de Broglie wavelength of the proton in the hydrogen atom as the electron and proton pirouette around their common center of mass, for the lowest orbital? I believe the center-of-mass of the system would actually be inside the proton due to the great differential in mass between the proton and electron - a ratio of about 1800 to 1. So it might not be an easy calculation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The de Broglie wavelength corresponds to a particle in a "momentum state" which is a planewave like state. An atom which is at some particular energy level actually has multiple different wavelengths associated with it, So we don't always think of electrons in an atom of having a particular de Broglie wavelength, I think. There might still be situations where that makes sense.

A different length which is useful for describing hydrogen atoms is the Bohr radius, commonly denoted by ##a_0##.
 
  • #3
I just realized this morning the answer to my question. The de Broglie wavelength of the counter-orbiting proton (around the common center-of-mass of the system) in the H atom has to be virtually the same as that of the orbiting electron to a first order approximation. The reason is simple. Imagine two children on a seesaw, one twice as heavy as the other. The balance point between them will have a 2 to 1 ratio, so the heavy child will move at half the velocity as the light child, but being twice as heavy his momentum will be the same as the light child. Same situation in the simplified Bohr version of the Hydrogen atom - the momentum of the counter-orbiting proton has to be the same as the momentum (mv) for the electron. So the formula for the de Broglie wavelength λ = h/mv will produce the same result for both the proton and electron - as the product of mv will be the same for both.However, something doesn't seem right with this assessment, as it would mean the de Broglie wavelength for the wobbling proton would be approximately 10,000 times the proton's diameter. I'm going to have to think this over some more.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Davephaelon said:
However, something doesn't seem right with this assessment, as it would mean the de Broglie wavelength for the wobbling proton would be approximately 10,000 times the proton's diameter. I'm going to have to think this over some more.

Did you see MisterX's response above? You are considering a system in which the proton is in an energy eigenstate, and therefore has no meaningful de Broglie wavelength. That's why you can't calculate anything that makes sense.

As a historical note, the notion of de Broglie wavelength that you're using was long ago discarded. It was a good hint and an interesting heuristic on the way to the development of modern ("modern"? we're talking more than 75 years old now) quantum theory, but it never was applicable to systems as complex as a hydrogen atom and is no part of the modern theory.
 
  • #5
Oh yes I understood what MisterX was driving at; I knew that the basic Bohr model predated, by about a decade, the revolutionary advances by Heisenberg, Schrodinger, and a host of others, that forms the foundation of modern Quantum Mechanics theory. I was aware that the electron's position in its ground state, S-orbital is described by a spherically symmetric region of probability, so that a single orbit/energy is a gross simplification; though a useful heuristic model, as you point out, in early efforts to understand the micro-world.

But, isn't there an equivalence here? By that I mean doesn't the orbiting electron also exist in a eigenstate, where the median value of all its summed energy states corresponds, approximately, to the Bohr radius, or energy? So, wouldn't the median value of all the energy states of the proton also be, approximately, what I indicated above?
 
  • #6
Davephaelon said:
Oh yes I understood what MisterX was driving at; I knew that the basic Bohr model predated, by about a decade, the revolutionary advances by Heisenberg, Schrodinger, and a host of others, that forms the foundation of modern Quantum Mechanics theory. I was aware that the electron's position in its ground state, S-orbital is described by a spherically symmetric region of probability, so that a single orbit/energy is a gross simplification; though a useful heuristic model, as you point out, in early efforts to understand the micro-world.
I don't understand - you were asking about calculating the de Broglie wavelength of the proton, and both MisterX and I are saying that is a dated and obsolete concept and that's why you're not getting sensible results out of your calculation. Other than also being dated and obsolete, what does the Bohr model have to do with the de Broglie wavelength of the proton?

By that I mean doesn't the orbiting electron also exist in a eigenstate, where the median value of all its summed energy states corresponds, approximately, to the Bohr radius, or energy? So, wouldn't the median value of all the energy states of the proton also be, approximately, what I indicated above?
The electron isn't orbiting of course... but yes, it is in an energy eigenstate. That means it has a single clearly defined energy, but that's not going to get you any closer to a de Broglie wavelength for the proton.
 

1. What is the DeBroglie wavelength of a proton in a hydrogen atom?

The DeBroglie wavelength of a proton in a hydrogen atom is approximately 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000001 meters, or 0.1 angstroms. This is a very small wavelength, as protons are much larger than electrons and their wavelengths are inversely proportional to their mass.

2. How is the DeBroglie wavelength of a proton in a hydrogen atom calculated?

The DeBroglie wavelength can be calculated using the formula λ = h/mv, where λ is the wavelength, h is Planck's constant, m is the mass of the particle, and v is the velocity of the particle. In the case of a proton in a hydrogen atom, the velocity is equal to the speed of the electron in the hydrogen atom.

3. What is the significance of the DeBroglie wavelength in the hydrogen atom?

The DeBroglie wavelength is significant because it demonstrates the wave-particle duality of matter. It shows that even particles with mass, such as protons, can exhibit wave-like properties. In the case of the hydrogen atom, the DeBroglie wavelength of the proton is related to the wavefunction of the electron and helps to describe the probability distribution of the electron's location in the atom.

4. How does the DeBroglie wavelength of a proton in a hydrogen atom compare to that of an electron?

The DeBroglie wavelength of a proton is much smaller than that of an electron in a hydrogen atom. This is because the mass of a proton is much larger than that of an electron, resulting in a smaller wavelength. Additionally, the electron in a hydrogen atom has a higher velocity than the proton, further increasing its wavelength.

5. Can the DeBroglie wavelength of a proton in a hydrogen atom be measured?

Yes, the DeBroglie wavelength of a proton in a hydrogen atom can be indirectly measured using various experimental techniques such as diffraction and scattering. These methods involve measuring the interference patterns of the proton's wavefunction, which can provide information about its wavelength. However, due to the very small size of the DeBroglie wavelength, it is difficult to directly measure it with current technology.

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
42
Views
14K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top