DeBroglie wavelength of Proton in H atom

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on calculating the de Broglie wavelength of the proton in a hydrogen atom, considering the dynamics of the electron and proton as they orbit their common center of mass. Participants explore the implications of mass differences and the relevance of the de Broglie wavelength in this context, alongside historical perspectives on quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to calculate the de Broglie wavelength of the proton, noting the center of mass is likely within the proton due to the mass ratio with the electron.
  • Another participant suggests that the de Broglie wavelength is associated with a particle in a momentum state, indicating that atoms at specific energy levels have multiple wavelengths, complicating the application of the de Broglie concept.
  • A participant proposes that the de Broglie wavelength of the counter-orbiting proton should be similar to that of the electron, based on momentum considerations, but expresses uncertainty about the implications of this assessment.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of using de Broglie wavelength in this context, with references to the historical development of quantum mechanics and the obsolescence of certain models.
  • Another participant acknowledges the limitations of the Bohr model and discusses the electron's position as described by a probability distribution, questioning the relevance of this model to the de Broglie wavelength of the proton.
  • There is a reiteration that both the proton and electron exist in energy eigenstates, but this does not clarify the calculation of the proton's de Broglie wavelength.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the de Broglie wavelength concept to the hydrogen atom, with some arguing it is outdated and others attempting to reconcile it with modern quantum mechanics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the calculation and relevance of the de Broglie wavelength for the proton.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on historical models and the complexity of the hydrogen atom as a quantum system, which may not align with classical interpretations of de Broglie wavelength.

Davephaelon
Messages
143
Reaction score
26
How would one calculate the de Broglie wavelength of the proton in the hydrogen atom as the electron and proton pirouette around their common center of mass, for the lowest orbital? I believe the center-of-mass of the system would actually be inside the proton due to the great differential in mass between the proton and electron - a ratio of about 1800 to 1. So it might not be an easy calculation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The de Broglie wavelength corresponds to a particle in a "momentum state" which is a planewave like state. An atom which is at some particular energy level actually has multiple different wavelengths associated with it, So we don't always think of electrons in an atom of having a particular de Broglie wavelength, I think. There might still be situations where that makes sense.

A different length which is useful for describing hydrogen atoms is the Bohr radius, commonly denoted by ##a_0##.
 
I just realized this morning the answer to my question. The de Broglie wavelength of the counter-orbiting proton (around the common center-of-mass of the system) in the H atom has to be virtually the same as that of the orbiting electron to a first order approximation. The reason is simple. Imagine two children on a seesaw, one twice as heavy as the other. The balance point between them will have a 2 to 1 ratio, so the heavy child will move at half the velocity as the light child, but being twice as heavy his momentum will be the same as the light child. Same situation in the simplified Bohr version of the Hydrogen atom - the momentum of the counter-orbiting proton has to be the same as the momentum (mv) for the electron. So the formula for the de Broglie wavelength λ = h/mv will produce the same result for both the proton and electron - as the product of mv will be the same for both.However, something doesn't seem right with this assessment, as it would mean the de Broglie wavelength for the wobbling proton would be approximately 10,000 times the proton's diameter. I'm going to have to think this over some more.
 
Last edited:
Davephaelon said:
However, something doesn't seem right with this assessment, as it would mean the de Broglie wavelength for the wobbling proton would be approximately 10,000 times the proton's diameter. I'm going to have to think this over some more.

Did you see MisterX's response above? You are considering a system in which the proton is in an energy eigenstate, and therefore has no meaningful de Broglie wavelength. That's why you can't calculate anything that makes sense.

As a historical note, the notion of de Broglie wavelength that you're using was long ago discarded. It was a good hint and an interesting heuristic on the way to the development of modern ("modern"? we're talking more than 75 years old now) quantum theory, but it never was applicable to systems as complex as a hydrogen atom and is no part of the modern theory.
 
Oh yes I understood what MisterX was driving at; I knew that the basic Bohr model predated, by about a decade, the revolutionary advances by Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and a host of others, that forms the foundation of modern Quantum Mechanics theory. I was aware that the electron's position in its ground state, S-orbital is described by a spherically symmetric region of probability, so that a single orbit/energy is a gross simplification; though a useful heuristic model, as you point out, in early efforts to understand the micro-world.

But, isn't there an equivalence here? By that I mean doesn't the orbiting electron also exist in a eigenstate, where the median value of all its summed energy states corresponds, approximately, to the Bohr radius, or energy? So, wouldn't the median value of all the energy states of the proton also be, approximately, what I indicated above?
 
Davephaelon said:
Oh yes I understood what MisterX was driving at; I knew that the basic Bohr model predated, by about a decade, the revolutionary advances by Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and a host of others, that forms the foundation of modern Quantum Mechanics theory. I was aware that the electron's position in its ground state, S-orbital is described by a spherically symmetric region of probability, so that a single orbit/energy is a gross simplification; though a useful heuristic model, as you point out, in early efforts to understand the micro-world.
I don't understand - you were asking about calculating the de Broglie wavelength of the proton, and both MisterX and I are saying that is a dated and obsolete concept and that's why you're not getting sensible results out of your calculation. Other than also being dated and obsolete, what does the Bohr model have to do with the de Broglie wavelength of the proton?

By that I mean doesn't the orbiting electron also exist in a eigenstate, where the median value of all its summed energy states corresponds, approximately, to the Bohr radius, or energy? So, wouldn't the median value of all the energy states of the proton also be, approximately, what I indicated above?
The electron isn't orbiting of course... but yes, it is in an energy eigenstate. That means it has a single clearly defined energy, but that's not going to get you any closer to a de Broglie wavelength for the proton.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
16K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K