Debunking the Myth: The Real Story Behind Bigfoot

  • Context: Schools 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr.Watson
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the topic of Bigfoot, questioning whether it is an urban legend or has some basis in reality. Participants explore various perspectives on the existence of Bigfoot, touching on folklore, anecdotal evidence, and the implications of belief in such creatures.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Bigfoot may be an urban legend, questioning the validity of claims surrounding its existence.
  • Others express frustration over the lack of definitive answers or evidence regarding Bigfoot, indicating a desire for more concrete information.
  • A participant references informal statistics from physicsGRE.com, implying that there may be a broader cultural or societal context influencing beliefs about Bigfoot.
  • One participant argues that the question of Bigfoot's existence is vague and context-dependent, suggesting that interpretations may vary based on geographical and cultural factors.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the size of a field (like condensed matter physics) and its competitiveness, drawing a parallel to the debate about Bigfoot's existence and the nature of evidence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of Bigfoot; multiple competing views remain, with some leaning towards skepticism and others open to the possibility of its existence.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about folklore, evidence, and cultural beliefs, with no clear resolution on the validity of claims regarding Bigfoot.

Mr.Watson
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Or is it just an urban legend?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Doesn't anyone know?
 


Going by informal statistics at physicsGRE.com... definitely.
 


This question is hopelessly vague. The only possible answer is "sometimes". It depends a great deal on the country and institute you are applying to and what your background is.
 


http://www.aip.org/

If you spend some time browsing the statistics you'll probably find what you're looking for. From the reports they typically publish on first year grad students, it looks like "condensed matter" is the field that gets all the big numbers.
 


On average, the answer is going to be yes. Condensed matter physics is such a broad classification, and it's the largest division of physics, that there are just more condensed matter physicists overall than high energy physicists. High energy physics is smaller, and although they have some really big projects like the LHC, there's still more condensed matter research going on because it's relevant to industry and technology (in a more direct fashion than the LHC and similar projects are). (Plus, lots of the folks working on the LHC are engineers and technicians, not just scientists).

At a given university, they might have a larger high energy faction than condensed matter faction, so at that university it might be easier to get into high energy physics.

It also depends on what subfield of condensed matter you are looking at. There's quite a lot of research on high temperature superconductors or nanomaterials, but maybe not as much on supersolids, for example.

Looking beyond grad school, though, if you intend to keep doing science in the field your get your Ph.D. in, your only option to keep doing high energy physics is to do postdocs and try and get a tenure-track job, which is extremely difficult, to say the least. Condensed matter research which focuses on materials will have many options in industry.
 


Do not confuse size with selectivity. Yes, condensed matter is the largest subfield of physics, but that does not mean that it is less competitive. Harvard is larger than the Marsha Kay Beauty College, but that does not mean it is less competitive.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K