Deceleration of a man falling off a cliff into snow

In summary, the problem involves calculating the depth a man would be buried in soft snow after falling off a cliff of 37.8 m and landing on his back with a constant deceleration of 100 g's. Using the SUVAT equations of motion, the time it takes for the man to fall is 2.78 seconds and his final velocity is 27.2 m/s. However, when trying to calculate the time and distance in the snow portion, there seems to be some discrepancy. Other equations of motion can also be used to solve this problem.
  • #1
salmayoussef
31
0

Homework Statement



A person can just survive a full-body collision (either to the front, back, or side) which results in a deceleration that is up about 100 g's. (One g is 9.8 m/s/s). At greater deceleration fatal brain damage will likely occur. If a 66.4 kg man falls of a cliff of height 37.8 m but manages to land flat on his back in soft snow, undergoing a constant deceleration of this magnitude, how deep would he be buried in the snow?

I feel like this is very simple and I'm just over thinking it...

dy = 37.8 m
g = -980 m/s2

(Not sure about g...)

Homework Equations



Possibly one of the constant acceleration equations (not sure which).

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to think about it as if the man was a car driving horizontally then suddenly begins to decelerate, then tried to find his distance after he breaks. No luck. I still can't figure it out... Any advice would be appreciated! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
salmayoussef said:
g = -980 m/s2

(Not sure about g...)
Why would you be "not sure"? In the problem it says "(One g is 9.8 m/s/s)"

You know that v= gt where v is the speed after t seconds and d= (g/2)t^2 where d is the distance traveled in t seconds. How long will it take to fall 37.8 m? (I assume that is the distance to the top of the snowbank.) What will his speed be at that point (as he hits the snow bank).

At -100g= -980 m/s^2 (was that what you meant, not "g= -980 m/s2"?) how long will it take for him to stop (his speed to become 0)? And how far will he have gone through the snow in that time?
 
  • #3
Well, I tried it out using d = 0.5gt2 and found that the time is 2.78 s.

Then using time, I found that the final velocity was 27.2 m/s. (v = gt)

Then for the snow portion, I tried to find time using the same equation and got 0.028 s which I don't think is right. Waaaaay too fast!

And finally, I used d = 0.5(Vf+Vi)t to find that d = 0.38 m. But it isn't the proper answer! Any advice?
 
  • #4
salmayoussef said:
Well, I tried it out using d = 0.5gt2 and found that the time is 2.78 s.

Then using time, I found that the final velocity was 27.2 m/s. (v = gt)

Then for the snow portion, I tried to find time using the same equation and got 0.028 s which I don't think is right. Waaaaay too fast!
Show your working so we can see where you may be going wrong. Or confirm that you're right.
 
  • #5
The equation d = 0.5gt^2 looks like a variant of the SUVAT equations of motion. This problem is mostly about distance and velocity so why use one that involves time? That's not the wrong approach but it might be worth you looking at some of the others.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equations_of_motion#SUVAT_equations
 
Back
Top