MHB Decreasing Values: 1.000000 to 0.670625

  • Thread starter Thread starter blueberry123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    decreasing
blueberry123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1.000000
0.912606
0.837875
0.781625
0.737125
0.700875
0.670625
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It seems to be neither arithmetic nor geometric. You can estimate it with a best fit strategy if that is good enough. It might help if you could tell us where you are getting these numbers from.

-Dan
 
blueberry123 said:
1.000000
0.912606
0.837875
0.781625
0.737125
0.700875
0.670625

not a bad curve fit ... what do you think?

quadgraf.png
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top