Deducing Bragg angle for G_220 Bragg peak for LiF

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the reciprocal lattice vectors for LiF and deducing the Bragg angle for the (2,2,0) Bragg peak, given a specific lattice parameter and wavelength. The subject area includes crystallography and diffraction principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the reciprocal lattice vector and deduce the Bragg angle but expresses uncertainty regarding the correctness of their approach due to the complexity of the FCC structure with two basis atoms. Some participants question the validity of the given wavelength, suggesting it may be a typographical error.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the wavelength provided in the problem. There is a suggestion to contact the lecturer for clarification, indicating a productive direction in addressing the uncertainty surrounding the problem.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that the question is from a past exam paper and expresses confusion about the calculation of reciprocal lattice vectors for an FCC structure with two basis atoms. There is also mention of the potential error in the wavelength provided in the question.

ChrisJ
Messages
70
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Calculate the reciprocal lattice vectors for LiF.
Given the lattice parameter ##a = 0.402 nm## calculate the magnitude of the ##\textbf{G_{220}}##
reciprocal lattice vector for LiF and thus deduce the Bragg angle for the (2,2,0)
Bragg peak for incoming wavelength of ##0.9 nm.##

Homework Equations


##d=\frac{2 \pi}{|\textbf{G}_{220}|} ##
##|\textbf{G}_{220}| = \frac{2 \pi}{a}\sqrt{h^2+k^2+l^2}##
##2d \sin{\theta} = n \lambda ##

The Attempt at a Solution


This is not coursework, it is a question from a past exam paper I'm trying to do in preparation for my exam.

In a previous bit of the question we are given the positions of the Lithium and Flourine atoms and I deduced it was a FCC with 2 basis atoms, I have never calculated the reciprocal lattice vectors for FCC with basis of 2 atoms before, so just went ahead as I have always done hoping it was the same, but I assume that is not correct and is why I am getting it wrong.

But I don't know why they asked us to calculate them anyway, as in the notes we were given are included the equations in the relevant equations section above, so I just did.

<br /> |\textbf{G}_{220}| = |\textbf{G}_{220}| = \frac{2 \pi}{a}\sqrt{2^2+2^2}= \frac{4\sqrt{2}\pi}{4.02 \times 10^{-10}}=4.42\times 10^{10} \textrm{m}^{-1} \\<br /> \sin{\theta}=\frac{\lambda |\textbf{G}_{220}| }{4 \pi} = \frac{9 \cdot 4.42}{4 \pi}<br />

Which I obviously can't take the inverse sin of since its not between 0-1 .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A wavelength of 0.9 nm does seem large. Could it actually be 0.9 A° = .09 nm?
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
A wavelength of 0.9 nm does seem large. Could it actually be 0.9 A° = .09 nm?
It 100% says 0.9nm on the past paper, after tearing my hair out for ages I too was starting to think that it could possibly be an error on the paper and be 0.9 angstroms instead, but didn't feel confident in emailing the lecturer to ask. But I wrote the text from the question word for word on this post, so at least its not just me.

Thanks :)
 
OK. Contacting your lecturer is a good idea in my opinion, just to make sure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K