Deducing Maclaurin series converges from Leibniz formula

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the Maclaurin series for the function f(x) = xe^(-x²), with a focus on using the Leibniz formula for differentiation. Participants explore methods to demonstrate convergence, including the ratio test and series expansion techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a recurrence relation derived from the Leibniz formula for the derivatives of f(x) and aims to show that the Maclaurin series converges for all x.
  • Another participant suggests using the Maclaurin series expansion for e^(-x²) and multiplying by x to derive the series for f(x), which may facilitate convergence testing.
  • A participant questions whether it is possible to prove convergence solely using the Leibniz formula, indicating a desire for alternative approaches.
  • There is a suggestion that obtaining the correct series expansion is crucial for applying the ratio test effectively.
  • Participants note that both series expansions should be equal, implying that testing this equality could validate the approaches discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best method to demonstrate convergence, with some favoring the Leibniz formula while others advocate for series expansion techniques. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most effective approach.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the expression of the nth term of the Maclaurin series and the application of the ratio test, as well as the dependence on the correctness of the series expansion derived from the Leibniz formula.

sr3056
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Given f(x) = xe-x2 I can differentiate once and use Leibniz to show that for n greater than 1

f(n) = -2nf(n-2) - 2xf(n-1)

I want to show that the Maclaurin series for f(x) converges for all x.

At x = 0, the above Leibniz formula becomes f(n) = -2nf(n-2)

I know that f(0) = zero so this implies that even terms of Maclaurin series are zero, whilst
f(1)(0) = 1, f(3)(0) = -6*1 = -6, f(5)(0) = -10*-6*1 = 60 and so on.

I assume that to show convergence, I need to find a formula for the nth term of the Maclaurin series, then use the ratio test to show that terms are decreasing. I can see the pattern (the derivative increases by a factor of 2(2n + 1) each time) but am unsure how to express this in a formula. Perhaps using factorials?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey sr3056 and welcome to the forums.

One suggestion is to use the Mclaurin series expansion for e^(-x^2) and then multiply all terms by x. So you start by expanding e^(-x) and then replace every x by an x^2, and multiply each term by x.

The above should give you a series expansion which should allow you to do a further test for convergence.
 
Thanks. Is there no way of proving convergence from the Leibniz formula though?
 
If you get a series that is the correct definition, then you should be able to do what you said (i.e. the ratio test), so as long as you get the correct series expansion, it will be OK.

Both series expansions should be equal though and testing this will test whether your above approach is the same as the one I discussed above.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K