Deduction of the equation of frequencies of a piano

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bruno Tolentino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequencies Piano
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the origin of the function f(n) related to piano key frequencies, specifically addressing its derivation from equal temperament tuning rather than a differential equation. It highlights the concept of 'Keyboard Stretch,' where tuners adjust frequencies to avoid discordant resonances, exemplified by the tuning of A440 to potentially 1765 Hz at higher octaves. The conversation also touches on the development of an electronic tuner that aimed to assist in tuning concert grands in noisy environments, ultimately concluding that modern smartphone apps now offer superior accuracy in frequency analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of equal temperament tuning
  • Familiarity with the concept of frequency and pitch
  • Knowledge of piano tuning techniques
  • Basic principles of sound resonance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematics behind equal temperament tuning
  • Explore the concept of 'Keyboard Stretch' in piano tuning
  • Learn about modern electronic tuning devices and their functionalities
  • Investigate smartphone apps for frequency analysis and tuning
USEFUL FOR

Piano tuners, music theorists, electronic engineers, and anyone interested in the science of musical tuning and frequency analysis.

Bruno Tolentino
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
I'd like of know from where originated the funcion f(n) presented in this page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piano_key_frequencies)!?

Probably, f(n), is the solution of some differential equation and I'd like of understand how this diff equation was architected.

If someone can answer this doubt I will be so much happy!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no differential equation. This is just equal tempement - you have twelve equal steps every octave, and each octave doubles the frequency.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bruno Tolentino
Unless it's on a piano. The region known as the temperament is tuned in a logical manner, but from then on, the tuner applies a bizarrely difficult series of modifications to obviate discordant resonances. This is known as 'Keyboard Stretch'. For example, A 440 could still be near to 440, but by the time one had reached 1760, it could be as high as 1765! I have no idea how this seems to gel with the rest of the orchestra.

I once spent a year or so developing an electronic tuner - one which resonated the string continuously while tuning or analysis of case resonance was undertaken. The head of electronics at Essex University UK thought the chip was made by Fairchild and had gone the same route while a graduate student. The chip wasn't totally accurate, but human ability to sense frequency it seems is limited to about 6 cents so it was better than a lot of tuners.

Despite months of trying, I was never able to master the skill of a classical tuning.

I later caused the main oscillator to be allowed to swing 100 cents either side of the main frequency. (100 cents is a half tone) This allowed sustained investigation into unwanted resonances. There was a well known case of a plastic chocolate box in a cupboard causing tuners much grief.

The whole idea of my machine was to tune concert grands in a noisy environment but I concluded it was not a viable investment. A while later a tuner turned up at my home in Texas and the subject of electronic aids came up. He then demonstrated a tuner which he used 'When tired.' After tuning the temperament, he let the device run and it then produced the stretch for that particular piano. My device would have been totally out-classed.

An App for my phone now produces a frequency counter and generator that's more accurate. And it was free.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K