Defending Against Nanotech Murder: Is It a Realistic Threat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nanotechnology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential threat of nanotechnology in the form of fly-sized robots capable of delivering lethal substances, such as polonium, to unsuspecting victims. Participants explore defensive measures against such attacks, including the development of electromagnetic (EM) field generators designed to disable malicious nanodevices. Additionally, the conversation highlights the positive applications of nanotechnology, such as the creation of nano-mechanical antibodies that can combat viruses and mitigate chemical or radiation threats.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nanotechnology principles
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic field generation
  • Knowledge of mechanical viruses and their implications
  • Awareness of nanomedicine applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and functionality of electromagnetic field generators
  • Explore advancements in nanomedicine, particularly nano-mechanical antibodies
  • Investigate the concept of mechanical viruses and their potential threats
  • Study current defensive technologies against nanotechnology-based attacks
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for security researchers, nanotechnology experts, and professionals in defense technology who are focused on understanding and mitigating the risks associated with advanced nanotechnology applications.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Might it be possible?

Speculation: a fly-sized robot injects a polonium into an unsuspecting victim.

How can we defend against such attacks? What other fronts must we protect from nanotechnology - a replicating mechanical virus?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Those are some far fetched ideas for weapons.. maybe it would be one day possible so as for defense I'm sure it would be possible to come up with a safe field generator that produces EM fields that would specifically disable such devices.

Or the "good side" of your ideas are you can have friendly nano-mechanical anti-bodies that would fight off viruses and chemical/radiation attacks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 169 ·
6
Replies
169
Views
20K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K