Define a Dedekind cut and show the given set is(n't) a Dedekind cut

  • Thread starter Thread starter docnet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cut Set
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 4K views
docnet
Messages
796
Reaction score
487
Homework Statement
a) What is a Dedekind cut? Give the precise definition.

b) Let ##L## be a Dedekind cut. Is ##P=\{x^4|x\in L\}## a Dedekind cut?

c) Let ##L## be a Dedekind cut. Is ##P=\{23x|x\in L\}## a Dedekind cut?
Relevant Equations
##\mathbb{Q}##
a) a subset ##L\subset \mathbb{Q}## is a Dedekind cut if ##L## is proper, ##L## has no maximal element, and
$$\forall a,b\in \mathbb{Q}, [(a<b)\land( b\in L)\Longrightarrow a\in L]$$

b)
Is ##P=\{x^4|x\in L\}## a Dedekind cut?

P is proper:
$$(a\in L)\Longrightarrow (a^4\in P)\Longrightarrow P\neq \emptyset$$ $$(-1\in \mathbb{Q})\land (-1\notin P)\Longrightarrow P\neq \mathbb{Q}$$ So ##P## is a proper set.

P has no maximal element:
$$(\forall x \in L, x<d)\Longrightarrow( \forall x^4 \in P, x^4<d^4)$$ So ##P## has no maximal element.

P does not satisfy the 3rd property:
$$(-1\in \mathbb{Q})\land (a^4 \in P)\land(-1<a^4)\land (-1\notin P)$$ So ##P## is not a Dedekind cut.c)
Is ##M=\{23x|x\in L\}## a Dedekind cut?

M is proper:
$$(x\in L)\Longrightarrow (23x \in M)\Longrightarrow M\neq \emptyset$$ $$(L\neq \mathbb{Q})\Longrightarrow (d\notin L\quad \text{for some}\quad d\in\mathbb{Q})$$ $$\Longrightarrow( \mathbb{Q}\ni 23d\notin M)\Longrightarrow (M\neq \mathbb{Q})$$ So ##M## is a proper set.

M has no maximal element:
$$(\forall x\in L, x<d)\Longrightarrow (\forall 23x \in P, 23x<23d)$$ So ##M## has no maximal element.

M satisfies the 3rd property:
##L## satisfies the 3rd property, so $$\forall a,b\in \mathbb{Q}, [(a<b)\land( b\in L)\Longrightarrow a\in L]$$ Multiplying the ##a##s and ##b##s by ##23## leads to $$\forall 23a, 23b\in \mathbb{Q}, [(23a<23b)\land (23b\in M) \Longrightarrow 23a\in M]$$
##M## is a Dedekind cut.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You received no response since you asked no question, but if you want checking of your work, then in b, the argument for no maximal element contains a false claim, i.e. one can. have a<b but b^4< a^4, if a and b are negative.

In part c, the argument that the 3rd property holds is phrased incorrectly. namely one should assume that b is in L and a < 23b, then show a is in M.