MHB Define $f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}: f^{-1}(\left\{0,1,2\right\})$

Click For Summary
The function f is defined as f(n) = n^2 for all n in the integers. The inverse image f^{-1}({0,1,2}) consists of integers whose squares are in the set {0,1,2}. Since no integer can square to 2, the only integers that satisfy this condition are 0, -1, and 1. Therefore, f^{-1}({0,1,2}) equals {0, -1, 1}. This clarification emphasizes the distinction between the squares of integers and the integers themselves.
Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Define $f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}$ via $f(n) = n^2$ for all $n \in \mathbb{Z}$. Why does $f^{-1}(\left\{0,1,2\right\}) = \left\{0,-1,1\right\}$? The definition I'm using is $f^{-1}{(T)} = \left\{a \in A: f(a) \in T \right\}$ so we have $f^{-1}({ \left\{0,1,2\right\} }) = \left\{n \in \mathbb{Z}: n^2 \in \left\{0,1,2\right\} \right\}$. So I could think about this as all the integers whose squares is the set $ \left\{0,1,2\right\}$ but nothing I square would give me $2$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Guest said:
Define $f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}$ via $f(n) = n^2$ for all $n \in \mathbb{Z}$. Why does $f^{-1}(\left\{0,1,2\right\}) = \left\{0,-1,1\right\}$? The definition I'm using is $f^{-1}{(T)} = \left\{a \in A: f(a) \in T \right\}$ so we have $f^{-1}({ \left\{0,1,2\right\} }) = \left\{n \in \mathbb{Z}: n^2 \in \left\{0,1,2\right\} \right\}$. So I could think about this as all the integers whose squares is the set $ \left\{0,1,2\right\}$ but nothing I square would give me $2$.

Hi Guest,

Indeed, no integer squares to $2$, which is why there is no inverse of $2$.
It's not the set of integers whose squares is the set $ \left\{0,1,2\right\}$, but the set of integers that have squares in the set $ \left\{0,1,2\right\}$.
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K