MHB Define $f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}: f^{-1}(\left\{0,1,2\right\})$

AI Thread Summary
The function f is defined as f(n) = n^2 for all n in the integers. The inverse image f^{-1}({0,1,2}) consists of integers whose squares are in the set {0,1,2}. Since no integer can square to 2, the only integers that satisfy this condition are 0, -1, and 1. Therefore, f^{-1}({0,1,2}) equals {0, -1, 1}. This clarification emphasizes the distinction between the squares of integers and the integers themselves.
Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Define $f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}$ via $f(n) = n^2$ for all $n \in \mathbb{Z}$. Why does $f^{-1}(\left\{0,1,2\right\}) = \left\{0,-1,1\right\}$? The definition I'm using is $f^{-1}{(T)} = \left\{a \in A: f(a) \in T \right\}$ so we have $f^{-1}({ \left\{0,1,2\right\} }) = \left\{n \in \mathbb{Z}: n^2 \in \left\{0,1,2\right\} \right\}$. So I could think about this as all the integers whose squares is the set $ \left\{0,1,2\right\}$ but nothing I square would give me $2$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Guest said:
Define $f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}$ via $f(n) = n^2$ for all $n \in \mathbb{Z}$. Why does $f^{-1}(\left\{0,1,2\right\}) = \left\{0,-1,1\right\}$? The definition I'm using is $f^{-1}{(T)} = \left\{a \in A: f(a) \in T \right\}$ so we have $f^{-1}({ \left\{0,1,2\right\} }) = \left\{n \in \mathbb{Z}: n^2 \in \left\{0,1,2\right\} \right\}$. So I could think about this as all the integers whose squares is the set $ \left\{0,1,2\right\}$ but nothing I square would give me $2$.

Hi Guest,

Indeed, no integer squares to $2$, which is why there is no inverse of $2$.
It's not the set of integers whose squares is the set $ \left\{0,1,2\right\}$, but the set of integers that have squares in the set $ \left\{0,1,2\right\}$.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top