Define the sigma-algebra generated by a partition

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimholt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Partition
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 6K views
jimholt
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
If we have a partition [tex]\mathcal{P}=\{A_1,A_2\}[/tex] of some set [tex]A[/tex], then we can talk about the sigma-algebra generated by this partition as [tex]\Sigma=\{\emptyset, A_1,A_2,A\}[/tex].

How can I define this concept more generally?

Here is what I have:

A partition [tex]\mathcal{P}[/tex] of some set [tex]A[/tex] generates the sigma-algebra [tex]\Sigma$[/tex] if

i) [tex]\mathcal{P} \subset \Sigma$[/tex], and

ii) for every set [tex]S \in \Sigma[/tex] and every [tex]\omega \in S[/tex], [tex]\mathcal{P}(\omega) \subseteq S[/tex], where [tex]\mathcal{P}(\omega)[/tex] is the cell of [tex]\mathcal{P}[/tex] containing [tex]\omega[/tex].

Is this complete? I am wondering if it breaks down when [tex]\omega = \emptyset[/tex] (or whether this possibility is precluded by the definition). Or if anyone knows the "standard" definition, I would be glad to hear it.

Thanks for any help, folks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Really? No thoughts, suggestions, opinions?
 
Yes, that should work.
 
Cool, thanks a bunch. Just wanted to have another set of eyes look at it.