Defining the square root of an unbounded linear operator

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
I have started coming across square roots [itex](H+kI)^{\frac 12}[/itex] of slight modifications of Schrödinger operators [itex]H[/itex] on [itex]L^2(\mathbb R^d)[/itex]; that is, operators that look like this:
[tex] H = -\Delta + V(x),[/tex]
where [itex]\Delta[/itex] is the [itex]d[/itex]-dimensional Laplacian and [itex]V[/itex] corresponds to multiplication by some function. But how do we go about defining [itex](H+kI)^{1/2}[/itex]? My understanding was that we defined functions of self-adjoint operators by using the spectral theorem, but that only holds for bounded Borel functions, right? And [itex]f(x) = \sqrt x[/itex] certainly isn't bounded. And because of the [itex]\Delta[/itex], the operator [itex]H[/itex] isn't even bounded. So what do we do?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dextercioby said:
How did you get the square root ?

What exactly do you mean? Are you asking how the square root is being used in the paper? From what I can tell, they are using the square root as a tool to prove a lemma that characterizes the operator [itex]H[/itex] itself. Not sure that answers your question though...
 
dextercioby said:
Yes, I want to know the context they use the square root. Hopefully it's a free paper, I can't get in a journal behind a pay-wall.

Ok, sure! I think it's on the arXiv: http://arxiv.org/pdf/math-ph/0304009.pdf. The relevant lemma is on pg. 15; it's Lemma 5.1.
 
The powers of the operators can be defined through their spectral decomposition or by trans-Fourier-ing their (eigen)vectors, so that the power is transferred onto regular functions. These 2 'tricks' work irrespective whether the operator is bounded or not.