Defining the square root of an unbounded linear operator

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of the square root of an unbounded linear operator, specifically in the context of Schrödinger operators on L²(ℝⁿ). Participants explore the challenges of defining (H+kI)^{1/2} when the operator H is unbounded and the implications of the spectral theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to define (H+kI)^{1/2} given that the operator H is unbounded and the square root function is not bounded.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the context in which the square root is used in a referenced paper, suggesting it serves as a tool for proving a lemma related to the operator H.
  • A later reply mentions that the powers of operators can be defined through spectral decomposition or by transforming their eigenvectors, indicating that these methods can apply regardless of whether the operator is bounded.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the definition of the square root of unbounded operators, and there is no consensus on the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the spectral theorem's applicability and the challenges posed by the unbounded nature of the operators in question.

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
I have started coming across square roots [itex](H+kI)^{\frac 12}[/itex] of slight modifications of Schrödinger operators [itex]H[/itex] on [itex]L^2(\mathbb R^d)[/itex]; that is, operators that look like this:
[tex] H = -\Delta + V(x),[/tex]
where [itex]\Delta[/itex] is the [itex]d[/itex]-dimensional Laplacian and [itex]V[/itex] corresponds to multiplication by some function. But how do we go about defining [itex](H+kI)^{1/2}[/itex]? My understanding was that we defined functions of self-adjoint operators by using the spectral theorem, but that only holds for bounded Borel functions, right? And [itex]f(x) = \sqrt x[/itex] certainly isn't bounded. And because of the [itex]\Delta[/itex], the operator [itex]H[/itex] isn't even bounded. So what do we do?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dextercioby said:
How did you get the square root ?

What exactly do you mean? Are you asking how the square root is being used in the paper? From what I can tell, they are using the square root as a tool to prove a lemma that characterizes the operator [itex]H[/itex] itself. Not sure that answers your question though...
 
Yes, I want to know the context they use the square root. Hopefully it's a free paper, I can't get in a journal behind a pay-wall.
 
dextercioby said:
Yes, I want to know the context they use the square root. Hopefully it's a free paper, I can't get in a journal behind a pay-wall.

Ok, sure! I think it's on the arXiv: http://arxiv.org/pdf/math-ph/0304009.pdf. The relevant lemma is on pg. 15; it's Lemma 5.1.
 
The powers of the operators can be defined through their spectral decomposition or by trans-Fourier-ing their (eigen)vectors, so that the power is transferred onto regular functions. These 2 'tricks' work irrespective whether the operator is bounded or not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K