Is the identity of a group unique?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lebnm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Group
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of group identities in abstract algebra, specifically addressing the uniqueness of the identity element in a group. The proof provided in the referenced book asserts that if the left inverse property \( g^{-1} g = e \) holds, then \( g g^{-1} = e \) follows, using the action of \( g \) on both sides. However, the necessity of proving that both left and right identities are the same is emphasized, as well as the requirement to demonstrate that there cannot be two distinct identities. The discussion concludes that understanding these properties is crucial for establishing the uniqueness of the identity element in group theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory fundamentals
  • Familiarity with the concepts of identity and inverse elements in groups
  • Knowledge of algebraic proofs and logical reasoning
  • Basic experience with abstract algebra terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the uniqueness of the identity element in groups
  • Learn about the properties of left and right inverses in group theory
  • Explore the definition and properties of subgroups and their identities
  • Investigate the implications of solving equations in group theory, specifically \( ax = b \) and \( xa = b \)
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying abstract algebra, educators teaching group theory, and anyone interested in the foundational properties of mathematical structures.

Lebnm
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
In general, the textbooks says that, if the set ##G## is a group, so to every element ##g \in G## there is other element ##g^{-1} \in G## such that ##g g^{-1} = g^{-1}g = e##, where ##e## is the identity of the group. But I am reading a book where this propriete is write only as ##g^{-1} g = e##, and the book says that ##g g^{-1} = e## follows from this. The proof it gives is: Applaying ##g## on the left on the both sides, we have $$g(g^{-1} g) = (g g^{-1}) g = g e = g,$$and of this the book concludes that ##g g^{-1}## is equal to ##e##, because its action in ##g## gives ##g##.
Is it correct? To me, it was necessary to proof also that ##g(g g^{-1}) = g##, because with this I could use the fact that the identity of a group is unique.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To be exact, one first proves that left and right identity are the same: ##e_lg=ge_r=g \Longrightarrow e_l=e_r## and that there cannot be two identities, i.e. we have to show ##e=e'##. Then you can conclude that the right inverse is equal to the left inverse. (You wrote ##eg=ge## which you cannot know from the start, then you concluded ##gg^{-1}=e## which is also not known until the uniqueness of ##e## has been proven.)

Another way to define a group is by demanding that the equations ##ax=b## and ##xa=b## can uniquely be solved (IIRC).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Abhishek11235
A nice exercise in this area is to show that the identity of a subgroup must be the same as that of the supergroup. And that a subset S is a group iff for all a,b in S, ##ab^{-1}## is also in S.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
988
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
658
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K