Definition of Absolute Electrode Potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition of Absolute Electrode Potential (E(abs)) as presented in John Bockris's "Modern Electrochemistry" and its comparison with the Wikipedia definition. The equation from Bockris includes the Galvani potential difference and the chemical potential of electrons in the metal divided by Faraday's constant. The Wikipedia definition incorporates the work function of the metal, which accounts for surface potential differences. Both definitions are fundamentally similar, with the work function representing the chemical potential per electron, despite variations in terminology and additional factors such as geometry and the Fermi surface.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrochemical potential and its components
  • Familiarity with Faraday's constant and its application in electrochemistry
  • Knowledge of work function and its significance in solid-state physics
  • Basic grasp of Fermi surface concepts in materials science
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Galvani potential difference in electrochemistry
  • Explore the relationship between chemical potential and work function in metals
  • Investigate the role of surface potential in electrochemical systems
  • Learn about the mathematical treatment of Fermi surfaces and their relevance to electrode potentials
USEFUL FOR

Electrochemists, materials scientists, and researchers in solid-state physics who are looking to deepen their understanding of electrode potentials and their definitions.

Dario56
Messages
289
Reaction score
48
Hey guys,

I have two questions:

1) I thought absolute electrode potential is galvani potential difference at the interface. However, it is given by this equation in John Bockris - Modern Electrochemistry: $$ E(abs) = ^M\Delta^S\phi - \mu_e^M/F $$
First term is galvani potential difference on the metal/solution interface and the other is chemical potential of electrons in the metal divided by Farady's constant

Why is chemical potential of electrons in metal included in the definition?

2) On wikipedia, absolute electrode potential is defined as: $$ E(abs) = ^M\Delta^S\phi + \Theta $$

Where second term is work function of the metal. This definition is a little bit different than in Bockris since work function includes surface potential difference on the interface in addition to chemical potential of electrons in the metal.

Why are these two definitions different?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
They are not essentially different. The work function is, roughly, the chemical potential per electron.
There are complicating factors because of choice of zero for the potential and the work function and a few more technical points involving geometry and the Fermi surface, but often these are not relevant. As usual, detailed semantic distinctions must be supplanted by appropriate maths.
 
hutchphd said:
They are not essentially different. The work function is, roughly, the chemical potential per electron.
There are complicating factors because of choice of zero for the potential and the work function and a few more technical points involving geometry and the Fermi surface, but often these are not relevant. As usual, detailed semantic distinctions must be supplanted by appropriate maths.
Yes as I mentioned in the post, work function is defined as: $$ \Theta = -\mu_e^M + zF\Xi^M $$

Other term is surface potential of the metal, so this term is the difference between the two definitions.

Maybe as you said, surface potential term is usually small compared to chemical potential term.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
969
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K