Definition of SO(n): O(n) & SL(n, \mathbb{R}) Intersection

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter topsquark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definitions of the special orthogonal group SO(n) in relation to the orthogonal group O(n) and the special linear group SL(n, \mathbb{R}). It establishes that SO(n) can be defined as the intersection of SL(n, \mathbb{R}) and O(n), where O(n) consists of n x n orthogonal matrices and SL(n, \mathbb{R}) consists of those matrices with a determinant of 1. The equivalence of the definitions of SO(n) is confirmed, highlighting the relationship between orthogonality and determinant conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix notation and operations, specifically n x n matrices.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of orthogonal matrices and their properties.
  • Knowledge of determinants and their significance in linear algebra.
  • Basic understanding of linear groups and their classifications.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of orthogonal matrices in O(n) and their applications in transformations.
  • Explore the implications of determinants in linear algebra, focusing on GL(n, \mathbb{R}) and SL(n, \mathbb{R}).
  • Investigate the geometric interpretations of SO(n) in relation to rotations in n-dimensional space.
  • Learn about the structure and applications of linear groups in various mathematical contexts.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, particularly those specializing in linear algebra, group theory, and geometric transformations, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of matrix groups and their properties.

topsquark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
MHB
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
843
Four definitions:
1) Define [math]M_n( \mathbb{R} )[/math] as the set of all n x n matrices over [math]\mathbb{R}[/math].

2) Define [math]O(n) = \{ A \in M_n ( \mathbb{R} ) | A A^T = I \}[/math]

3) Define [math]GL(n, \mathbb{R} ) = \{ A \in M_n( \mathbb{R} ) | \det A \neq 0 \}[/math]

4) Define [math]SL(n, \mathbb{R} ) = \{ A \in GL(n, \mathbb{R} ) | \det A = 1 \}[/math]

(I presume these are all standard, but the way the definitions are made plays into my question.)

My source now defines [math]SO(n) = SL(n, \mathbb{R} ) \cap O(n)[/math]

As typical I was able to sort this out as I typed it. My question was that wouldn't it make more sense to define [math]SO(n) = \{ A \in O(n) | \det A = 1 \}[/math] but now I see that both definitions are equivalent.

So no worries!

-Dan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
topsquark said:
Four definitions:
1) Define [math]M_n( \mathbb{R} )[/math] as the set of all n x n matrices over [math]\mathbb{R}[/math].

2) Define [math]O(n) = \{ A \in M_n ( \mathbb{R} ) | A A^T = I \}[/math]

3) Define [math]GL(n, \mathbb{R} ) = \{ A \in M_n( \mathbb{R} ) | \det A \neq 0 \}[/math]

4) Define [math]SL(n, \mathbb{R} ) = \{ A \in GL(n, \mathbb{R} ) | \det A = 1 \}[/math]

(I presume these are all standard, but the way the definitions are made plays into my question.)

My source now defines [math]SO(n) = SL(n, \mathbb{R} ) \cap O(n)[/math]

As typical I was able to sort this out as I typed it. My question was that wouldn't it make more sense to define [math]SO(n) = \{ A \in O(n) | \det A = 1 \}[/math] but now I see that both definitions are equivalent.

So no worries!

-Dan

This takes advantage of a special construction of English: the juxtaposition of two adjectives means both apply. That is saying "the tall English dude" is the same as saying:

The dude is English, and the dude is tall. In Mathese:

$\text{Dude} \in \{\text{tall dudes}\} \cap \{\text{English dudes}\} \iff \{\text{Dude} \in \{\text{English dudes}\}: \text{Dude} \in \{\text{tall dudes}\}\}$

In the case at hand: "special" means having determinant 1, and "orthogonal" means having the transpose as the inverse. The corresponding noun to "dude" in my example above is "linear (group)" (the group of UNITS of the ring $M_n(\Bbb R)$).

This is quite common, for example one may specify the set of all real numbers which are positive integers. While it is natural to interpret this as: first restrict to integers, and then restrict to positive integers, it is also possible to take the intersection of the positive reals with the integers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
932
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K