B Definition of Stellar Parallax from Alonso and Finn Volume 1

Click For Summary
The definition of stellar parallax from Alonso and Finn describes it as half the angle subtended by the Earth's diameter perpendicular to the line connecting the star and the sun. There is confusion regarding whether this refers to the Earth's diameter or its orbital diameter. Clarification suggests that it likely pertains to the Earth's orbital diameter, as parallax is primarily influenced by the Earth's orbit. The discussion emphasizes that the definition itself is not derived but rather a statement of the concept. Understanding this distinction is crucial for grasping the definition's implications in astronomy.
vibha_ganji
Messages
19
Reaction score
6
Hi! I read this definition of Stellar Parallax "It is expressed quantitatively by one-half the angle subtended by the Earth's diameter E1E2 perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun (see Fig. 2-10)." (Source Alonso and Finn: Volume 1). But, I was unable to understand how they derived this definition. Is there some typo or am I misuderstanding the description? Here is Figure 2-10. (This is not a homework question but rather a doubt I had when I was reading.)

1629511291211.png
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A definition is just that. It is not derived. You need to clarify your concern.
 
Sorry about that. What I meant was I do not understand how the definition represents the angle theta. When the text writes, “ It is expressed quantitatively by one-half the angle subtended by the Earth's diameter E1E2 perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun,” do they mean the angle subtended by the Earth’s orbit’s diameter and the line perpendicular to the line joining the star and the sun or do they mean the Earth’s diameter itself?
 
Pretty sure they mean the Earth's orbit's diameter. Hence why they say E1E2.
The diameter of the Earth doesn't make much sense by being here since the parallax is due almost entirely to Earth's orbit.
 
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
28K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K