Definition of the determinant i = 1

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jeff1evesque
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Determinant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition of the determinant, specifically when i = 1, and its implications for matrices in M_n_x_n(F). The lemma states that if row i of matrix B equals the standard basis vector e_k, then the determinant can be expressed as det(B) = (-1)^(i+k)det(B_i_k). The proof utilizes mathematical induction, confirming the lemma for n = 2 and extending it to larger matrices. Participants clarify that in this context, the elements of the standard basis vector e_k are equal to 1, which simplifies the determinant calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix notation and operations
  • Familiarity with determinants and their properties
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction
  • Concept of standard basis vectors in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants in linear algebra
  • Learn about mathematical induction proofs in matrix theory
  • Explore the implications of standard basis vectors in determinant calculations
  • Investigate advanced topics in matrix theory, such as eigenvalues and eigenvectors
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in understanding determinants and their applications in matrix theory.

jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
definition of the determinant i = 1"

Lemma:Let B be an element in M_n_x_n(F), where n >= 2. If row i of B equals e_k for some k (1<= k <= n ), then det(B) = (-1)^i^+^kdet(B_i_k).

Proof: The proof is by mathematical induction on n. The lemma is easily proved for n = 2. Assume that for some integer n >= 3, the lemma is true for (n-1) x (n-1) matrices, and let B be an nxn matrix in which row i of B equals e_kfor some k (1<=k<=n). The result follows immediately from the definition of the determinant i = 1.

Questions:
1. Can someone help me understand/prove the italized text above.. "...follows from immediately from the definition of the determinant i = 1"

2. And how does det(B) = (-1)^i^+^kdet(B_i_k).? Why isn't there a coefficient in that equation B_i_,_k? This questions is not necessary I guess- since If i follow and understand the proof in the book the logic will work out- but I always thought that in calculating a determinant there would be a scalar coefficient- thus: det(B) = B_i_,_k(-1)^i^+^kdet(B_i_k).

thanks,


JL
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jeff1evesque! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
jeff1evesque said:
… I always thought that in calculating a determinant there would be a scalar coefficient- thus: det(B) = B_i_,_k(-1)^i^+^kdet(B_i_k).

Yes, that's right …

but in this case, Bik is 1. :wink:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi jeff1evesque! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)


Yes, that's right …

but in this case, Bik is 1. :wink:


That would imply that every e_k = 1. The symbol e stands for the standard ordered basis- for our particular row 1 correct? So for row i, are all the elements e (standard ordered basis) equal to 1? But how can you assume the ordered basis for our row is all 1's? The e's simply denote the order of the basis for this particular row F^n.

Thanks so much,


JL
 
Hi jeff1evesque! :smile:
jeff1evesque said:
That would imply that every e_k = 1. The symbol e stands for the standard ordered basis- for our particular row 1 correct? So for row i, are all the elements e (standard ordered basis) equal to 1? But how can you assume the ordered basis for our row is all 1's? The e's simply denote the order of the basis for this particular row F^n.

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the notation, but I think it means that eg if row i of B equals e2, then row i is (0,1,0,0,…)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K