Delayed Choice Experiment - A thought.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Delayed Choice Experiment (DCE) challenges conventional understandings of light by suggesting that its behavior can be interpreted through a wave perspective. Participants in the discussion argue that if light is viewed as a spread-out wave, the results of the DCE become more intuitive and predictable. The conversation emphasizes that the duality of light—whether it behaves as a wave or a particle—affects the outcomes of experiments, reinforcing the idea that the nature of the question posed influences the answer received. This perspective aligns with historical views from physicists like Schrödinger and De Broglie.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Delayed Choice Experiment (DCE)
  • Basic knowledge of classical physics principles
  • Concepts of quantum mechanics as proposed by Schrödinger and De Broglie
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of wave-particle duality on quantum mechanics
  • Study the Delayed Choice Experiment in detail, including its historical context
  • Explore Schrödinger's and De Broglie's theories on wave functions
  • Investigate classical Newtonian physics and its relationship to quantum phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of light's behavior in experiments like the Delayed Choice Experiment.

hankaaron
Messages
83
Reaction score
4
I know the Delayed Choice Experiment has been beaten to death in the forum. But I was wondering if anyone can answer this question.

Would the results of the DCE seems so odd if we accept that light is really a spread out wave. That is assuming that the particle nature light is really just one incidence of a spread out wave.

It seems to me that if you insist that light is wavy, the DCE is exactly what you would expect.

In any case, even if light has particle/wave duality, the DCE is another example of "ask a wave question and you get a wave answer, ask a particle question and you get a particle answer". In the case of the DCE it seems we are asking light if it is made up of waves.

Thanks,
hankaaron
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hankaaron said:
I know the Delayed Choice Experiment has been beaten to death in the forum. But I was wondering if anyone can answer this question.

Would the results of the DCE seems so odd if we accept that light is really a spread out wave. That is assuming that the particle nature light is really just one incidence of a spread out wave.

It seems to me that if you insist that light is wavy, the DCE is exactly what you would expect.

In any case, even if light has particle/wave duality, the DCE is another example of "ask a wave question and you get a wave answer, ask a particle question and you get a particle answer". In the case of the DCE it seems we are asking light if it is made up of waves.

Thanks,
hankaaron

OK, but how does a wave viewpoint change the result: that the answer to the question arrived before we asked it? (...and this is not a signal from the future of course.)
 
DrChinese said:
OK, but how does a wave viewpoint change the result: that the answer to the question arrived before we asked it? (...and this is not a signal from the future of course.)

I take it you mean if wave-particle duality is the "real" phenomenon? I don't its a matter of knowing which question would be ask. I think its a matter of there being two answers, and we just sort get what we ask for.

But I really would like to know if you think the first idea is valid. That is, if we restrict light as constituting only of a spread out wave (like Schrödinger and De broglie believed), do the results of the DCE fit the Classical Newtonian model of physics- and begins to make intuitive sense?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
20K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K