Delayed choice measurement subsequent analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the delayed choice measurement associated with the Scully and Druhl signal-idler photon experiment, as detailed in Brian Greene's "Fabric of the Cosmos." It emphasizes that future measurements do not alter the pathway decisions made at the time of photon detection, despite a perceived "spooky" linkage. The conversation explores the potential for future technological advancements to extract which-path information from recorded data, suggesting that interference patterns could be restored upon initial observation, only to be later analyzed for path identification. This raises intriguing questions about the implications of time and measurement in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the Scully and Druhl signal-idler photon experiment
  • Knowledge of delayed choice experiments
  • Basic grasp of quantum entanglement concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in quantum measurement technologies
  • Explore the implications of quantum entanglement on delayed choice experiments
  • Investigate the principles of interference patterns in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the potential applications of quantum information retrieval
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and anyone interested in the implications of delayed choice measurements and advancements in quantum technology.

Cobalt101
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
This is a variant associated with the Scully and Druhl signal-idler photon delayed choice experiment, as described and discussed in Brian Greene's Fabric of the Cosmos. The commentary notes the "delay" may be configured to happen a very (years) long time after the photons pass the two slit/splitter. It is stressed that the future measurements do not change the pathway decision "today" but clearly there is a linkage in some "spooky" way. My thought is that it should be possible to set up the "eraser" in such a way that the which-path information contained in the "tagged" idler photon is obscured when it hits the detector "tomorrow" and is recorded, but that in some years time when some technology enhancement is enabled, the recorded detector information can subsequently extract the which-path information (a bit like dna analysis being used on cold cases). The outcome being that when the initial observation/measurement is made, the interference pattern should be restored, but at a subsequent time it should be possible to identify the path taken by an individual photon.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Cobalt101 said:
... in some years time when some technology enhancement is enabled, the recorded detector information can subsequently extract the which-path information ...

You mean, when the laws of physics change? :)

You may as well be talking about time travel "when some technology enhancement is enabled"...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K