The discussion centers on the scarcity of references for delayed eraser experiments specifically involving electrons, as opposed to photons. Participants note that while 'which-path' experiments have been conducted with electrons, the complexity of working with electrons—due to their charge and interaction with air—limits their use in quantum eraser experiments. Consequently, most research focuses on photons, which are easier to manipulate. The suggestion to search for "quantum eraser electron" yields limited results, often conflating theoretical discussions with practical experiments.
PREREQUISITESPhysicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and students interested in experimental physics, particularly those focusing on the behavior of electrons in quantum experiments.
Electrons are much harder to work with than photons. They’re charged and interact readily with air molecules so can only be used in a vacuum. They can’t be reflected with mirrors, routed through fiber optic cables, or manipulated with beam splitters. Thus most experiments are done with photons unless there’s a specific reason to prefer using electrons.jeremyfiennes said:Any reasons why?