Delta Epsilon Limit Proof - f(x,y) = xy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the limit of the function f(x,y) = xy as (x,y) approaches (a,b) using the precise definition of a limit. The key inequality established is |xy - ab| < (δ^2/4 + aδ/2 + bδ/2), which must be made less than ε. Participants suggest manipulating the expression |xy - ab| by breaking it down into components involving |x-a| and |y-b|, and utilizing the triangle inequality to derive a suitable ε. The proof requires careful handling of the terms as δ approaches zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Familiarity with basic algebraic manipulation of inequalities
  • Knowledge of the triangle inequality in mathematical proofs
  • Concept of convergence in multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the triangle inequality and its applications in proofs
  • Explore techniques for manipulating inequalities in calculus
  • Investigate convergence concepts in the context of multivariable functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on limit proofs, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of multivariable limit concepts.

JeffNYC
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
How does one prove:

limit xy = ab
x-> a
y -> b

using the precise definition of a limit?

My attempt:

|xy-ab|<ϵ

for:

0<|x-a|<δ/2
0<|y-b|<δ/2

it follows that:

δ/2-a <x< δ/2+a
δ/2-b <y< δ/2+b

then:

(δ/2-a)(δ/2-n) < xy < (δ/2+a)(δ/2+b)

(δ^2/4-aδ/2-bδ/2 +ab) <xy< (δ^2/4+aδ/2+bδ/2+ab )

So -

|xy-ab|< (δ^2/4+aδ/2+bδ/2)

and I need to make

|xy-ab|<ϵ

At this point I feel a bit lost - anyone have any ideas for this proof?

Thanks,

Jeff
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you want |xy- ab|&lt; \epsilon . Now, xy- ab= xy- ay+ ay- ab= y(x-a)+ a(y-b) so |xy- ab|\le |y||x-a|+ |a||y- b|. Since y converges to b, you can make |y-b| as small as you like so you can make it less than \epsilon/2a. The other term is a bit tricky. You need to make |y||x-a| less than \epsilon/2 but y is a variable. However, since y converges to b, you can make |y| less than |b|+1 so you can use that instead: since x converges to a, you can make |x-a|\le \epsilon/(|b|+ 1)&lt; \epsilon/|y|.
 
Any idea what's happening with the latex output?
 
( I assume a,b ≠ 0 )

| x - a | < ε' hence | x∙y - a∙y | < ε' ∙ | y |
| y - b | < ε' hence | y∙a - b∙a | < ε' ∙ | a |

you sum both inequalities

| x∙y - a∙y | + | y∙a - b∙a | < ε' ∙ | y | + ε' ∙ | a |

you use the triangle inequality

| x∙y - a∙y | + | y∙a - b∙a | > | x∙y - a∙y + y∙a - b∙a | = | x∙y - a∙b |

define ε = ε' ∙ | y | + ε' ∙ | b |

now putting everything together yields : ...
 
Last edited:
maybe multiplying works too?

-d1 + a < x < d1 + a
-d2 + b < y < d2 + b

=>
since -d1d2 < d1d2,

-d1d2-d1b-d2a < d1d2-d1b-d2a < xy - ab < d1d2 + d1b + d2a

then,

abs(xy - ab) < d1d2 + d1b + d2a

since a and b are fixed, as d1 and d2 go to zero, the abs goes to zero.

[edit: hm. no, the sign on the multiplication makes this an error.]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K