Delta function and dirac notation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the normalization of delta functions in Dirac notation, specifically addressing the expressions <a|a> and <a|-a>. It is clarified that <a|a> is not equal to 1 but rather approaches infinity, making normalization problematic. The square of a delta function is deemed undefined, reinforcing that normalization of distributions like delta functions is not meaningful. The conversation suggests seeking additional resources for better understanding applied mathematics in quantum mechanics. The importance of proper normalization techniques in quantum mechanics is emphasized.
KostasV
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello there !
I found this discussion http://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...a-delta-function-position-space-wave-function about dirac notation and delta function .
The one that answers to the problem says that ##<a|a>=1## and ##<a|-a>=0## .
As far as i know:
1) ##<a|-a>=δ(a-(-a))## which in this case is zero because delta function is zero everywhere except ##x=-a## where it goes to infinity. So i understand why this is zero.
2) ##<a|a>=δ(a-a) → ∞ ## and not 1 . Am I wrong and this ##<a|a>## is obviously 1. Can you explain me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KostasV said:
The one that answers to the problem says that ##<a|a>=1## and ##<a|-a>=0## .

You are correct - it is infinity. Strictly speaking its undefined, but is usually taken as infinity. The issue with infinity and why its better to have it undefined is c∂(t) is also zero when t is not zero and infinity when t = 0 for any positive c. So, naively, c'∂(t) = c∂(t) for any positive c or c'. But it acts differently when integrated.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
So it is wrong to normalize the function with the two delta functions that he gives using ##<a|a>=1## because it actually goes to infinity.
So how could we normalize ##ψ(x)=δ(x-a)+δ(x-a)## in a correct way ?
 
KostasV said:
So it is wrong to normalize the function with the two delta functions that he gives using ##<a|a>=1## because it actually goes to infinity. So how could we normalize ##ψ(x)=δ(x-a)+δ(x-a)## in a correct way ?

They are distributions - normalisation makes no sense. The square of a delta function doesn't exist.

I suggest getting hold of the following:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521558905/?tag=pfamazon01-20

It will help in many areas of applied math not just QM.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for your response :)
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K