Delta-potential scattering problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter fast_eddie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scattering
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the delta-potential scattering problem in a one-dimensional quantum system featuring a delta-potential barrier at x = 0 and an infinitely high wall at x = -a. The potential is defined as V = κδ(x) for the delta function and V = ∞ at the wall, with V = 0 elsewhere. The Schrödinger equation is derived for both regions, leading to wavefunctions ψ_1 and ψ_2. The user seeks assistance in determining the constants A, B, C, and D, and understanding the implications of boundary conditions in this semi-open system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the Schrödinger equation.
  • Familiarity with delta functions and their properties in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions and their application in wavefunction solutions.
  • Experience with scattering problems and S-matrix formalism.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of boundary conditions in quantum mechanics, particularly for delta potentials.
  • Learn about the S-matrix components and their significance in scattering theory.
  • Explore normalization techniques for wavefunctions in quantum systems.
  • Investigate similar quantum systems with different boundary conditions for comparative analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students studying quantum mechanics, and researchers working on scattering problems in one-dimensional systems.

fast_eddie
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am looking at a 1-d quantum system with a delta-potential barrier in the centre (at x = 0) and an infinitely high wall on one side of this barrier (at x = -a), while the system is open on the other side.

So the potential V is equal to:
V = κ\delta(x) at x = 0, κ being some constant and δ being the Dirac delta-function
V = ∞ at x = -a, this is where the wall is
and V = 0 everywhere else

Splitting the system into region 1 (the bounded part to the left of the delta-barrier, -a < x < 0) and region 2 (the open part to the right of the delta-barrier, x>0), we get V=0 in both regions and the Schrödinger equation will be of the same form:
-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} = E\psi

or
\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} = -k^2\psi
where k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}

And so the wavefunction in both regions has form:
\psi_1 = Ae^{ikx} + Be^{-ikx}
\psi_2 = Ce^{ikx} + De^{-ikx}

The boundary condition at -a gives:
Ae^{-ika} + Be^{ika} = 0
Or equivalently:
Acos(ka) = Bsin(ka)

And using the standard trick of integrating the Schrödinger equation on a small integral around the origin [-ε,ε] and taking the limit ε→0, we get another condition:
ik (C-D-A+B)= \frac{2m\kappa}{\hbar^2}(A+B)

which by rearranging we can also express as:
C-D = A(1-2i\beta) - B(1+2i\beta)
where \beta= \frac{m\kappa}{k\hbar^2}

And at this stage I am a bit stuck about what to do next with these boundary conditions, in order to solve for the constants A,B,C,D and get the S-matrix components. I have already solved this same problem in the case where there is a wall on either side of the delta-barrier, and in the case where the system is open on either side, but I'm not sure how to proceed with this semi-open case. Any help, hints or advice would be greatly appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you do to determine the constants in the case where its open on either side? I'm guessing you can follow a similar procedure here for the open side. That plus normalization should be enough.
 
In that case I simply took the constant D to be 0, since it represents the amplitudes of waves coming in from the right side, and in that example I made the arbitrary assumption to consider waves being propagated from the left only. This made everything a lot easier, but here I don't think I can do the same thing, since I should expect some reflected waves coming back in the opposite direction due to the wall. Am I right in thinking this?
 
That's true in the region between the infinite wall and the delta potential, however, for x>0 you can assume that there are no waves propagating from the right since there's no potential to the right of the delta function were they could be reflected.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K