Demonstrating that (im τ) \cap (ker τ) is the Zero Space

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alexfloo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space Zero
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the intersection of the image and kernel of a linear operator τ, denoted as (im τ) ∩ (ker τ), is the zero space under the condition that rk τ² = rk τ. The user establishes that im τ = im τ², indicating equal dimensions, and utilizes the rank-nullity theorem to derive that null τ = null τ². By defining σ as the restriction of τ to its image, the user demonstrates that σ is both surjective and injective, leading to the conclusion that ker σ = {0}, thus proving (im τ) ∩ (ker τ) = {0}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear operators and their properties
  • Familiarity with the rank-nullity theorem
  • Knowledge of finite-dimensional vector spaces
  • Concept of image and kernel of a linear transformation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the rank-nullity theorem in linear algebra
  • Explore properties of surjective and injective linear transformations
  • Learn about the relationship between image and kernel in linear operators
  • Investigate advanced topics in linear algebra, such as spectral theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of linear operators and their properties in finite-dimensional spaces.

alexfloo
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Consider a linear operator τ:V→V (where V is finite-dimensional) such that rk τ2=rk τ. Show that (im τ) \cap (ker τ) is the zero space.

Here's where I am:

Its easy to see that I am τ=im τ2, since it is a subspace with the same dimension. I also know that if (im τ) \cap (ker τ) contains a nonzero vector, then it has positive dimension.

My intuition is that I can use that positive dimension and the rank plus nullity theorem to show a contradiction, but I just can't seem to figure out how. Rank-plus-nullity gives me null τ = null τ2, and I know that dim ((im τ) \cap (ker τ)) ≤ null τ. Any idea where to go next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I got it:

Let σ denote the restriction of τ to its own image, and consider it as a function I am τ→im τ2.

It's easy to see that this function is surjective. Since it is a surjective map between finite-dimensional spaces of equal dimension, it is also injective, so ker σ = {0}.

However, ker σ = ker τ \cap I am τ, so this completes the proof.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K