- #1
Apothem
- 39
- 0
Problem:
Let f ∶ V → V be a linear operator on a finite-dimensional vector space V .
Prove that the sequence 0 → ker(f) → V → im(f) → 0 is exact at each term.
Attempt:
If I call:
I can show this for the following:
At im(f):
im(c)={c(v) | v∈V }=im(f)={e∈im(f) | d(e)=0}=ker(d)
At V:
im(b)={b(v) | v∈ker(f)}=ker(f)={e∈V | c(e)=0 ∈ im(f)}=ker(c)
I'm having trouble showing it is exact at ker(f) though. I know that im(a)=0 and ker(b)={v∈ker(f) | b(v)=0 ∈V} however doesn't this mean that ker(b)=ker(f), and so how can I deduce that ker(b)=ker(f)=im(a)=0?
Thanks for any help!
Let f ∶ V → V be a linear operator on a finite-dimensional vector space V .
Prove that the sequence 0 → ker(f) → V → im(f) → 0 is exact at each term.
Attempt:
If I call:
- a: 0 → ker(f),
- b: ker(f) → V,
- c: V → im(f),
- d: im(f) → 0.
- ker(f) if im(a)=ker(b),
- V if im(b)=ker(c),
- im(f) if im(c)=ker(d).
I can show this for the following:
At im(f):
im(c)={c(v) | v∈V }=im(f)={e∈im(f) | d(e)=0}=ker(d)
At V:
im(b)={b(v) | v∈ker(f)}=ker(f)={e∈V | c(e)=0 ∈ im(f)}=ker(c)
I'm having trouble showing it is exact at ker(f) though. I know that im(a)=0 and ker(b)={v∈ker(f) | b(v)=0 ∈V} however doesn't this mean that ker(b)=ker(f), and so how can I deduce that ker(b)=ker(f)=im(a)=0?
Thanks for any help!