1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Demonstration [L_i,x_j]= ε_ijk x_k

  1. Jun 27, 2012 #1
    Hi!
    I have to show that
    [itex] [L_i,x_j]= i \hbar \varepsilon_{ijk} x_k [/itex]

    but my result is different, I'm definitely making a mistake :confused:
    ok I wrote
    [itex] L_i = \varepsilon_{ijk} x_j p_k [/itex]
    then
    [itex] [L_i,x_l]= \varepsilon_{ijk} ( [x_j p_k , x_l] ) = \varepsilon_{ijk} ( {x_j [p_k , x_l] + [x_j , x_l] p_k } ) = \varepsilon_{ijk} ( {x_j [p_k , x_l] } ) = [/itex]

    [itex] = \varepsilon_{ijk} ( {x_j \frac{\hbar}{i} δ_{kl} } ) = \frac{\hbar}{i} \varepsilon_{ijk} {x_j } [/itex]

    can anyone tell me where I'm wrong? :frown:
    thanks anyway! :smile:
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 27, 2012 #2

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    welcome to pf!

    hi ebol! welcome to pf! :smile:
    but [itex]\frac{1}{i} \varepsilon_{ijk} {x_j } = i \varepsilon_{ijk} x_k [/itex] :wink:
     
  4. Jun 27, 2012 #3
    ah!
    and why? :)
    Because the indices [itex] j [/itex] and [itex] k [/itex] commute and changes the sign?
     
  5. Jun 27, 2012 #4

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    yup! :biggrin:

    that's what ε does!​
     
  6. Jul 3, 2012 #5
    thank you very much!
    I arrived at the solution but I did not know :D
     
  7. Jul 3, 2012 #6

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    he he :biggrin:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Demonstration [L_i,x_j]= ε_ijk x_k
Loading...