Density constant along streamline of incompressible fluid

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the density of an incompressible fluid remains constant along streamlines in a steady flow where the divergence of velocity (div.u) equals zero. Participants suggest using the continuity equation and the integral expression derived from mass conservation principles. Key insights include the relationship between mass flow rates at the ends of a tubular volume and the assumption that the mass of fluid within the tube remains constant, leading to the conclusion that density does not vary along the streamline.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles, particularly the continuity equation.
  • Familiarity with the concept of streamlines in fluid flow.
  • Knowledge of the divergence operator and its implications in vector calculus.
  • Basic grasp of Bernoulli's equation and its applications in fluid mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the continuity equation in fluid dynamics.
  • Learn about the divergence theorem and its role in fluid flow analysis.
  • Explore the implications of incompressibility in fluid mechanics and its mathematical formulations.
  • Investigate the relationship between velocity, area, and density in steady flow scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for fluid mechanics students, engineers working with fluid systems, and researchers focusing on incompressible flow dynamics.

jmz34
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Question: Show that for a steady flow with div.u=0, the density is constant along streamlines.


I just don't see how to approach this question without Bernoulli's equation, I can see that the Lagrangian derivative of the density is zero but that doesn't specifically show that the density is constant along streamlines.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi jmz34! :smile:

try proving it the same way you would for Bernoulli's equation …

consider a section of a tube bounded by streamlines :wink:
 
Hi, thanks for your help- but I just need a bit more guidance.

By considering a tubular volume bounded by streamlines, I've considered the rate of change of mass inside this volume and equated it to the momentum flux through the surface.

This has led to the integral expression for the continuity equation- expanding out div.(pu) (where p=density and u=velocity), I've been able to use the fact that div.u=0 and I'm left with the remainder of the integral expression:

INT(dp/dt)dV=INT(u.grad(p))dV

I don't really see why u must be orthogonal to the gradient of p.

Thanks.
 
hi jmz34! :smile:

(have a rho: ρ and a grad: ∇ :wink:)

i'm not sure what you've done :confused:

since no fluid can go through the sides of the tube, all you need do is consider the rate of gain or loss of fluid at the two ends of the tube :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi jmz34! :smile:

(have a rho: ρ and a grad: ∇ :wink:)

i'm not sure what you've done :confused:

since no fluid can go through the sides of the tube, all you need do is consider the rate of gain or loss of fluid at the two ends of the tube :wink:


Surely this is not a simple matter of saying:

(d/dt)INTρdV = INT(over end A) ρu(r).ds - INT(over end B) ρu(r+dr).ds

Where A and B are the ends of the tube.

I'm under the impression that it cannot be assumed that the densities at A, within the volume V and at B are the same.

This is probably a simple problem so sorry for not seeing it already.
 
ok, assume ρ depends on distance, and write it …

(d/dt) ∫ ρdV = ∫ (over end A) ρAu(r).ds - ∫ (over end B) ρBu(r+dr).ds …

(and then replace each ∫ by the area :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
ok, assume ρ depends on distance, and write it …

(d/dt) ∫ ρdV = ∫ (over end A) ρAu(r).ds - ∫ (over end B) ρBu(r+dr).ds …

(and then replace each ∫ by the area :wink:)

I'm still very confused.

Do we have to assume that the areas A and B are the same? Surely we can imagine a scenario where the streamlines diverge and so A and B are different.

Thanks very much for your help.
 
no, we assume A and B are different …

you should get AρAuA = BρBuB

(oh, I've just noticed, it needn't have been u(r) and u(r+dr) … the tube can be as long as we like :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
no, we assume A and B are different …

you should get AρAuA = BρBuB

(oh, I've just noticed, it needn't have been u(r) and u(r+dr) … the tube can be as long as we like :wink:)


So you're assuming that the mass of fluid within the tube is constant? I don't see how it's ok to say this, I mean if the density can vary- the mass within the tube can also vary?

But if I can understand that then the expression you've given makes sense since the velocity times area along the tube (the flux) must be constant.
 
  • #10
jmz34 said:
So you're assuming that the mass of fluid within the tube is constant?

no, I'm saying that mass out minus mass in = that integral, and if you put du/dx = 0, you should get that integral to be zero :smile:

(for example, using the divergence theorem)
 
  • #11
Ok thanks a lot for all your help :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K