Density of Gliese 581 d: What's the Real Number?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The density of Gliese 581 d is under scrutiny due to conflicting estimates regarding its radius and mass. According to available data, Gliese 581 d has a radius approximately 1.96 times that of Earth and a mass about 7.7 times greater, which suggests a density similar to Earth's. However, the reported density of 730 kg/m³ (0.73 g/cm³) raises questions, as it is significantly lower than expected and comparable to that of Saturn. The lack of citations in the sources further complicates the reliability of these figures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of planetary density calculations
  • Familiarity with mass and volume relationships
  • Knowledge of celestial body measurements
  • Basic grasp of astrophysical terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research authoritative sources on exoplanet density measurements
  • Explore the methods for calculating planetary density using mass and volume
  • Investigate the characteristics of Gliese 581 system and its planets
  • Learn about the implications of density variations in celestial bodies
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students interested in exoplanet research and density estimation methodologies.

DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
24,467
Reaction score
8,726
I'm trying to find a reasonable estimate of the density of Gliese 581 d (not c).

According to Wiki, d is ~1.96x the radius of Earth and ~7.7x the mass. This makes for a density very near Earth's (2^3=8). Yet they then go on to list its density as 730kg/m^3 or 0.73g/cm^3 - almost as rarefied as Saturn.

Can anyone point me at some more authoritative numbers? I know we're only estimating, but clearly one of those three numbers r,d or m is spurious.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
I'm trying to find a reasonable estimate of the density of Gliese 581 d (not c).

According to Wiki, d is ~1.96x the radius of Earth and ~7.7x the mass. This makes for a density very near Earth's (2^3=8). Yet they then go on to list its density as 730kg/m^3 or 0.73g/cm^3 - almost as rarefied as Saturn.

Can anyone point me at some more authoritative numbers? I know we're only estimating, but clearly one of those three numbers r,d or m is spurious.

They all could be right due to a few things. When you calculate the density via M/V you are basically assuming a constant density throughout the entire planet, but usually that is a decent for a very rough approximation.

I notice the article you mention is lacking citations on both the radius and the density, so it is possible those are flawed as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
16K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K