Density of states, and integral of the Sommerfeld type

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the density of states in the context of a quantum system, specifically focusing on electrons in a metal and the associated integrals related to energy states at zero and non-zero temperatures.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the transition from summation over wave vector states to integrals involving the density of states. Questions arise regarding the change of variables from k to energy ε and the rigorous derivation of the density of states.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the change of variables and its implications for the density of states. There is acknowledgment of the clarity gained from these discussions, though some confusion remains regarding the derivation process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly defining the limits of integration, emphasizing that both k and ε are positive quantities, which affects the evaluation of the integrals involved.

Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30
It is easy to show that when you have a quantum system, let's think for example in electrons in a metal, then there appears summation over electron states of the form, e.g. for the energy for a free electron gas at T=0K:

##E=2 \sum_{k\leq k_f} \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}k^2##

Where ##k_f## denotes the Fermi wave vector.

In general one has sums of the form:

##\sum_{k} F(\vec{k})##

Now, for a free electorn gas one has that the volume in k space per allowed k value is ##\Delta \vec{k}=\frac{8\pi^3}{V}## where V is the volume of the solid (I'm following Aschroft and Mermin, solid state physics, page 37). So that in the limit of large V, one has:

##\displaystyle \lim_{V\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{V} \sum_{k} F(\vec{k}) \Delta k= \int \frac{d^3k}{8\pi^3} F(k).##

For the energy at non zero temperature one has

##E=2 \sum_k \epsilon(k) f(\epsilon_k)##

With:
##\epsilon_k=\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}k^2##

In general one has a dependence on energy ##\epsilon## per electron on the wave vector k, and f denotes the Fermi-Dirac distribution.

In the limit of large V, one then has:

##\lim \frac{E}{V}=u=\frac{1}{4\pi} \int \epsilon(k)f(\epsilon(k))d^3k##

Now, for the arbitrary function ##F(k)##, one can solve the integral in spherical coordinates:
##\int \frac{d^3k}{8\pi^3} F(k)=\frac{1}{\pi^2}\int dk k^2 F(\epsilon_k)##

So, that's ok, now the next step the book does is the one that is not clear to me how to get. In this step, this integral is taken to the one that is commonly used to evaluate the internal energy, or the number of electrons, etc. its the integral which I call as the "Sommerfeld type" because is that Sommerfeld used to make the "Sommerfeld expansion"

In this step, it is introduced the density of states

##\frac{1}{\pi^2}\int dk k^2 f(\epsilon_k)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} d\epsilon g(\epsilon) F(\epsilon)##

Where is used the fact that the integrand depends on ##\vec k## only through the electronic energy ##\epsilon =\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}k^2##

I hoped to derive this result just by calculation of the differentials, to get something like ##d\epsilon g(\epsilon)=\frac{k^2 dk}{\pi^2}##

The density of states is defined as ##g(\epsilon)=\frac{dn}{d\epsilon}##

Where ##n=\frac{N}{V}## is the number of electrons per unit volume, the electronic density.
 
Hi Telemachus! I don't quite understand the question here - is it the change of variable from k to \epsilon that's causing confusion?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Telemachus
Yes, that's it.
 
Yes, that's it, I don't understand how to get the density of states in that step. I know the integral makes perfect sense, I have used it, but I don't know how to derive the result rigorously.

PS: sorry for the double post.

PS2: I saw a mistake in the formula I've posted, it is obvious, but anyway it should read:

##\frac{1}{\pi^2}\int dk k^2 F(\epsilon_k)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} d\epsilon g(\epsilon) F(\epsilon)##
 
Last edited:
The change of variables in the integral should be straightforward:
\epsilon = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}\\<br /> <br /> k = \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}} \; \epsilon^{1/2}\\<br /> <br /> dk = \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}} \; \epsilon^{-1/2} \; d\epsilon<br />
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Telemachus
Great, thanks! that's exactly what I wanted, I don't know why I couldn't see that the density of states emerged naturally from there!
 
No problem!

Btw your integrals should go from 0 to \infty, not from -\infty to \infty, since k and \epsilon are both positive.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Telemachus

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
764
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K