Density of States: Varying Boundary Conditions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the density of states in quantum mechanics, specifically comparing vanishing boundary conditions and periodic boundary conditions. Under vanishing boundary conditions, wave numbers are defined as k=nπ/L, considering only positive k to prevent double counting of equivalent standing wave solutions. In contrast, periodic boundary conditions allow for both positive and negative wave numbers, represented as k=2nπ/L, reflecting the nature of traveling waves. This distinction is crucial for accurate calculations in quantum systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with wave functions and boundary conditions
  • Knowledge of the mathematical representation of wave numbers
  • Basic concepts of density of states in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of vanishing boundary conditions in quantum systems
  • Study the effects of periodic boundary conditions on wave functions
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of density of states for different boundary conditions
  • Learn about applications of density of states in solid-state physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in wave behavior and density of states calculations in various boundary conditions.

PineApple2
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Consider waves in a box. It is customary to calculate the density of states either by enforcing vanishing boundary conditions, then the wave numbers are
k=\frac{n\pi}{L} and we take only positive k,
or using periodic boundary conditions, in which case k=\frac{2n\pi}{L}
and taking all wave numbers.

My question is - why in the case of vanishing boundary conditions do we take only positive wave numbers? and why in the case of periodic boundary conditions do we take both positive and negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first case, vanishing boundary conditions, the solutions are standing waves, and the solutions for +k and -k are exactly the same. So we use just positive k to avoid counting them twice.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K