If we have an infinite square well, I can follow the usual solution in Griffiths but I now want to impose periodic boundary conditions. I have(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\psi(x) = A\sin(kx) + B\cos(kx)[/tex]

with boundary conditions [tex]\psi(x) = \psi(x+L)[/tex]

In the fixed boundary case, we had [tex]\psi(0) = 0[/tex] which meant [tex]B=0[/tex] and [tex]\psi(L)=0[/tex] which allows discrete values of k. I'm a little stuck with how to proceed with this in the periodic boundary condition case.

I think that [tex]k = n\pi/L[/tex] must still be true to satisfy the boundary condition (though I'm unable prove it). But now, I think that negative n also matter and they're different to the positive n case.

What is the general wavefunction solution in this case?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Infinite square well solution - periodic boundary conditions

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Infinite square solution | Date |
---|---|

I Harmonic Oscillator equivalence | Feb 6, 2017 |

I Finite vs. Infinite Square Well potential base question | Mar 2, 2016 |

Additional quantum states of the infinite square well | Nov 27, 2015 |

Exponentials or trig functions for finite square well? | Oct 25, 2015 |

Infinite square well solution | Mar 28, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**