Dental Biotech: Synthesizing Fluorapatite

  • Thread starter Thread starter bomba923
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biotechnology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential for synthesizing fluorapatite (Ca5[(PO4)3F]) biologically, as an alternative to relying on fluoride from drinking water and toothpaste. Fluorapatite is more chemically stable than hydroxyapatite (Ca5[(PO4)3OH]) and dissolves at a lower pH, providing enhanced resistance to cavities. The conversation also raises concerns regarding the risks of excessive fluoride exposure, which can damage teeth and bones, highlighting the need for careful consideration of fluoride levels in biological applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite chemistry
  • Knowledge of fluoride's role in dental health
  • Familiarity with genetic modification techniques
  • Awareness of the effects of fluoride toxicity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the genetic mechanisms involved in hydroxyapatite synthesis
  • Explore methods for synthesizing fluorapatite in a laboratory setting
  • Investigate the health implications of fluoride exposure on dental and bone health
  • Study the solubility products of hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite
USEFUL FOR

Biotechnologists, dental researchers, and health professionals interested in dental materials and fluoride's impact on oral health.

bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
Some background information first:

*Hydroxyapatite (i.e., Ca5[(PO4)3OH]) comprises 97-98% of human tooth enamel. It will demineralize at pH 5.5.

*Fluoride ions are usually added to drinking water and are found in fluoride toothpastes (commonly via NaF).
According to Wikipedia,
Fluoride ions can replace hydroxide ions in hydroxyapatite (Ca5[(PO4)3OH]), forming fluorapatite (Ca5[(PO4)3F]), which is more chemically stable and dissolves at pH 4.5. This is generally believed to lead to fewer cavities, since stronger acids are needed to attack the tooth enamel.

According to the http://www.uvm.edu/~swgordon/131-01/131web/caseymorley/discussion.html ,
The difference in solubility products between hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite is important to consider when examining their resistance to cavities. As discussed in demineralization, hydroxyapatite is more dissociated in equilibrium than fluorapatite, which assumingly allows acids to penetrate the crystal structure more easily.
Perhaps the most important property of fluorapatite in its resistance to cavities is the F- itself. When F- ions are released, they help kill cavity-causing bacteria.
Sounds wonderful :cool:
-----------------------------
Now here is my question:

-What if the formation of fluorapatite (for our teeth) did not require drinking water, and fluoride toothpaste? What if...say, we could synthesize fluorapatite ourselves (biologically speaking)?
-Is there a genetic basis for the synthesis of hydroxyapatite?→Can we alter this...to produce fluorapatite instead :smile:?

(*I am not certain, however, as to where the body might 'obtain' these fluoride anions...early on...(But I like biotechnology))
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
We'd still need to get fluoride from somewhere.

But, related to your question, I just came across this article today saying that you can also get too much fluoride, and it can damage teeth and bones!

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20060322/D8GGNC6O3.html
WASHINGTON (AP) - The high levels of fluoride that occur naturally in some drinking water can cause tooth and bone damage and should be reduced, the National Research Council said Wednesday.

The study did not analyze the benefits or risks of adding fluoride to drinking water. Instead it looked at the current maximum limit of 4 milligrams per liter. Approximately 200,000 people live in communities where that level occurs naturally in water.
 
I believe that the hydroxyapatite found in enamel is also the same that is found in bone. It may not possible to modify one without the other thus there may be some broader-reaching toxicities associated with this application of fluoride, especially when you are talking about incorporating it into developing systems. Your teeth may be better off, but the damage that was incurred during bone development way outweighs it. Evolution may have avoided/eliminated direct exposure to fluoride during these sensitive time periods and instead opted for later incorporation via exposure of the external compartment. Of course, this is purely hypothetical.