Dependence of exchange interaction on system size in Ising model

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the dependence of exchange interaction values (JAA, JBB, JAB) on system size (N) in the context of the Ising model for a binary system. It is established that J is generally considered a microscopic interaction parameter that remains localized and is not affected by the system size, particularly under periodic boundary conditions. The participants clarify that the model described is an inhomogeneous system with two types of spins (A and B), leading to different exchange interactions. The correct representation of the energy equation is confirmed as E = -∑ J_{ij}(s_i,s_j)s_is_j.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Ising model and its applications in statistical mechanics.
  • Familiarity with concepts of exchange interaction and spin systems.
  • Knowledge of periodic boundary conditions in computational physics.
  • Basic grasp of energy equations in lattice models.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of boundary conditions on exchange interactions in spin systems.
  • Explore the differences between homogeneous and inhomogeneous systems in the context of the Ising model.
  • Study the effects of varying system size on microscopic interaction parameters in statistical mechanics.
  • Learn about computational methods for simulating binary spin systems using the Ising model.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and researchers in statistical mechanics interested in the behavior of spin systems and the Ising model, particularly in binary compositions.

cosmicraga
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
In the well known Ising model, without any external field (H=0), the energy (E), spins (s) and exchange interaction (J) are related as in the following equation
$$
E = -\sum_{<ij>}J_{ij}s_{i}s_{j}
$$

Jij is site dependent and consists of three components JAA, JBB and JABwhere A is say up spin and B is down spin on a lattice (say SL).

For a material of type AxB1-x with system size N = 100 (N is number of spins), I know the values of JAA, JBB and JAB. Here JAA=E(x=1)/nAA and JBB=E(x=0)/nBB are constant for any x. JAB changes with x. nAA is number of AA bonds.

E(x=1) means Energy of the system when x=1 for AxB1-x material, i.e. Energy of the system when the system consists of only up spins (all A). Similarly E(x=0) means energy of the system when there is only down spins (all B).

x is composition, x=0.25 means 25% of N is A spins and rest are B spins.

**Queston 1**: If I increase my system size N to 200, then shall the values of JAA, JBB and JAB change?

**Question 2**: If the values of JAA, JBB and JAB change with N, then with what factor shall I increase it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Um this is confusing.
You are describing a system where J is spin dependent. This might be written as
E = -\sum_{&lt;ij&gt;}J_{ij}(s_i,s_j)s_is_j
This is NOT the Ising model. The Ising model has a constant J which is independent of the spin. But you are also describing a system which lacks some fundamental symmetries, so it's very confusing.

It sounds like what you want to describe is an inhomogeneous system, where you have two types of atoms, A and B. The exchange interaction is different between different types of atoms, which is why you have three values for J. This is an Ising model for a binary system.

Usually the answer to your question 1 is no. J is generally regarded as a microscopic interaction parameter which is rather localized and it is not affected by the extent of the system. But you have not specified your boundary conditions. If you have some sort of surface, the value of J might be different at the surface. If you are using periodic boundary conditions then J should not change.
 
>> $$ E = -\sum_{<ij>}J_{ij}(s_i,s_j)s_is_j $$

Yes, this is better representation.

>> This is an Ising model for a binary system.

Yes, you are right.

>> But you have not specified your boundary conditions.

Yes, I am using periodic boundary condition in all directions.

Thanks for your answer. :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
920
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K