berkeman said:
This is a technical forum at PF, so you are required to post mainstream/valid links to what you have been reading on your question.
This is a common questions in the mainstream. I just want to understand the exact chemical pathways. I read this for example:
Someone asked: "Do you really need to "deplete glycogen stores" in order to burn fat at all?".
Someone answered:
"Let's get something clear. 95% of the people in ANY weight loss sub, not just keto, have no freaking clue what they're doing.
No, you don't need to deplete glycogen stores to burn fat. Fat burning (lipolysis) AND glucose burning (glycolysis) happen simultaneously throughout the day, even in people not in a caloric deficit.
The rates of each of these energy mechanisms varies based on many factors, including energy level (lower energy = more lipolysis), hormone levels (higher insulin, more glycolysis, higher glucagon, more lipolysis), activity levels (high intensity, quick = glycolysis), what you're eating (more carbs, more glycolysis), etc.
If you DO deplete your glycogen stores, you leave your body no choice but to burn fat and the glucose it can produce via gluconeogenesis, which is really just enough for your brain, RBCs and a few other things.
But as others have said, you can lose fat on any type of diet. You can lose fat on Hershey bars if you want. Hopefully your goal is to do more than lose fat though."
Is it true? Need medical references about it or the chemical pathways involved why fat burning can occur even when glycogen stores are not depleted.