Derivation of Average Square Energy Fluctuation in a Canonical System

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the average square energy fluctuation in a canonical system using the Boltzmann distribution law. The probability of state ##v## is defined as ##P_v = Q^{-1} e^{-\beta E_v}##, where ##Q## is the normalization constant given by ##Q = \sum_{v} e^{-\beta E_v}##. A key point of confusion arises regarding the transition from the expression ##Q^{-1}(\partial^2 Q / \partial \beta^2)_{N, V} - Q^{-2}(\partial Q / \partial \beta)^{2}_{N,V}## to ##(\partial ^2 \ln Q / \partial \beta^2)_{N,V}##. The recommended approach is to reverse-engineer the derivation by starting from ##(\partial ^2 \ln Q / \partial \beta^2)_{N,V}## and calculating the necessary derivatives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Boltzmann distribution and canonical systems
  • Familiarity with statistical mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of differentiation techniques in calculus
  • Experience with normalization constants in probability theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Boltzmann distribution in detail
  • Learn about energy fluctuations in canonical ensembles
  • Explore advanced calculus techniques for handling derivatives
  • Investigate the implications of the normalization constant in statistical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in statistical mechanics, graduate students studying thermodynamics, and researchers focusing on energy fluctuations in canonical systems.

phun_physics
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
I am currently reading through Chandler's Introduction to Modern Statistical Mechanics and would like insight into this derivation
The canonical ( Boltzmann) distribution law for a canonical system is described the probability of state ##v## by ##P_v = Q^{-1} e^{-\beta E_v} ## where ##Q^{-1}## is the normalization constant of ##\sum_v P_v = 1## and therefore ##Q = \sum_{v}e^{-\beta E_v}##. Chandler then derives ## \langle( \delta E_v)^2 \rangle## in the attachment.

I am confused on how he went from these steps: ##Q^{-1}(\partial^2 Q / \partial \beta^2)_{N, V} - Q^{-2}(\partial Q / \partial \beta)^{2}_{N,V}## = ##(\partial ^2 lnQ / \partial \beta^2)_{N,V}##

Any help would be extremely appreciated! Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • derivation.PNG
    derivation.PNG
    29.1 KB · Views: 294
Science news on Phys.org
phun_physics said:
I am confused on how he went from these steps: ##Q^{-1}(\partial^2 Q / \partial \beta^2)_{N, V} - Q^{-2}(\partial Q / \partial \beta)^{2}_{N,V}## = ##(\partial ^2 lnQ / \partial \beta^2)_{N,V}##
Do it backwards. Start from ##(\partial ^2 \ln Q / \partial \beta^2)_{N,V}## and calculate the derivatives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
671
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K