1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Derivation of gravitational redshift: Mass of a photon?

  1. Mar 22, 2014 #1
    This is not exactly a homework question.

    In a physics textbook, they derive an expression for gravitational redshift of a photon emitted by a star at a large distance from the source by taking photon as a mass travelling up, against a gravitational potential and hence expending its electromagnetic/quantum energy. The mass of the photon is taken to be:
    [itex]m = \frac{h\nu}{c^{2}}.[/itex]​

    According to that equation, the mass of an X-ray photon of [itex]10^{21} Hz[/itex] would be about 8 times mass of an electron.

    Is this treatment appropriate?

    PS: I'm aware that the "accepted" derivation for gravitational redshift involves general relativity, but the expression derived in this text is a special case of that expression.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 22, 2014 #2

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    If you replace m by the energy E, you get a correct approach, so where is the point of using a relativistic mass...
    Anyway, it gives correct results.

    A photon with that frequency (I would call it gamma instead of X-ray, but that does not matter) has more energy than an electron at rest, indeed.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Derivation of gravitational redshift: Mass of a photon?
Loading...