Derivation of rotation isometry on the complex plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the algebraic formula for rotation isometry on the complex plane, specifically using the function f(z) = az + b. It establishes that when a = e^{iθ} and |a| = 1, the function represents a rotation about the point w = b/(1 − a). The critical distinction is made that if a = 1, f(z) becomes a translation rather than a rotation. The participants emphasize the necessity of these conditions to validate the rotation properties of the function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Understanding of isometries in the complex plane
  • Familiarity with the properties of complex numbers, particularly modulus and argument
  • Basic knowledge of LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex functions, focusing on isometries
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of complex multiplication
  • Explore the implications of the modulus condition |a| = 1 in complex transformations
  • Review the use of LaTeX for clear mathematical communication
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in complex analysis and geometric transformations will benefit from this discussion.

PcumP_Ravenclaw
Messages
105
Reaction score
4
Dear all, can you please verify if my derivation of the algebraic formula for the rotation isometry is correct. The handwritten file is attached.

The derivation from the book (Alan F beardon, Algebra and Geometry) which is succinct but rather unclear is given below.

Assume that f (z) = az + b. If a = 1 then f is a translation. If a = 1,
then f (w) = w, where w = b/(1 − a), and f (z) − w = a(z − w). It is now
clear that f is a rotation about w of angle θ, where a = ## e^{iθ} ## .

danke...
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    26.6 KB · Views: 483
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried to arrive at my solution beginning with ## f(z) − w = a(z − w) ## and they both matched! but the reason for ## a !=1 ## is so that a will have imaginary part therefore an angle θ to rotate about??

The reason why ## |a| =1 ## is so that z is not proportionally multiplied/scaled ??

danke..
 
It's hard to follow the handwritten stuff, since there are no explanations in it. So I'll just comment on what you said here. You defined f by f(z)=az+b, so it follows immediately that if a=1, then f is a translation. Your definition of w makes sense if and only if a≠1, so I first assumed that the next step is to examine that case. But a few steps later, you wrote ##a=e^{i\theta}##, which only makes sense if |a|=1. So you should have stated earlier that the case you're investigating is a≠1, |a|=1. To show that f is a rotation around w when these conditions are met, it's sufficient to show that |f(z)-w|=|z-w|. I would say that your typed statements do that, but you could have included more details. We have
$$f(z)-w=az+b-w=az+w(1-a)-w= a(z-w)+w-w =a(z-w)$$ and therefore
$$|f(z)-w|=|a||z-w|=|z-w|.$$ As you can see, the assumption that |a|=1 is essential.

By the way, you should try to avoid notations like a!=0. The ugliness can be avoided by using the LaTeX code \neq, or just the ≠ symbol that you find when you click on the ∑ symbol in the editor. The notation a!=0 is especially bad since the most obvious interpretation of it is different from what you had in mind.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PcumP_Ravenclaw

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K