Derivation of Uncertainty Princple

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisLM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Uncertainty
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Generalized Uncertainty Principle as presented in "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by J.J. Sakurai. The inequality is expressed as <( s.d. of operator A)^2> <( s.d. of operator B)^2> >= 1/4 |<[A,B]>|^2 + 1/4 |<{s.d of A, s.d of B}>|^2. Participants clarify that the omission of the second term (the anticommutator) is justified because it only strengthens the inequality, making it more aesthetically pleasing while retaining its validity. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding Dirac Notation in the context of Quantum Information Theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Generalized Uncertainty Principle
  • Familiarity with Dirac Notation
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics concepts
  • Experience with operator algebra in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Generalized Uncertainty Principle in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the role of anticommutators in quantum theory
  • Learn about operator algebra and its applications in Quantum Information Theory
  • Review J.J. Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate students in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and quantum information theory, as well as educators and researchers seeking to clarify the Generalized Uncertainty Principle.

ChrisLM
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Referrence to Modern Quantum Mechanics, J.J.Sakurai,
I found the "Generalized Uncertainty Principle" is that
<( s.d. of operator A)^2> <( s.d. of operator B)^2> >= 1/4 |<[A,B]>|^2 + 1/4 |<{s.d of A, s.d of B}>|^2

I hope it is not difficult to read, as I don't know how to type it formally.
I would like to ask why the inequality finally omitted the second (the anticommutator) term ?
Sakurai said it is because the second term can only make the inequality relation stronger.
I can't understand. Besides, I am a UG Year 1 students, but familiar to Dirac Notation as I am doing UG research on Quantum Information Theory. I hope anyone can explain it in a easy way ^^ Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second term is always positive. Therefore if LHS >= First + Second, LHS >= First will always be true. And omitting the second term makes the uncertainty principle look "nicer".
 
Hi ChrisLM! :smile:

oooh, nicksauce :smile: has beat me to it!

anyway, have a geq: ≥, and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K