In the derivation of the generalized uncertainty principle (as pgs 1-2 of here), there is an anticommutator term that is dropped at the end, leaving just the commutator part...this is said to "strengthen" the relation, as both terms are positive.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I don't understand this. So we basically have C>A+B, and we are dropping B. Then we are lowering the lower limit of the uncertainty, which I interpret as making the relation 'looser' rather than 'stronger'. Can anyone try convincing me otherwise?

Thanks!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# General Uncertainty Relation -- Why drop anticommutator?

Loading...

Similar Threads - General Uncertainty Relation | Date |
---|---|

I Generalized coordinates basic question | Feb 24, 2018 |

I Can the Schrodinger equation satisfy Laplace's equation? | Feb 22, 2018 |

A Probability of obtaining general quantum measurement outcome | Feb 5, 2018 |

Tangibly Explaining HUP to General Chemistry Students | Dec 19, 2015 |

General Uncertainty Principle | May 26, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**