Derivative dot product cross product

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivative of the dot product involving a vector and the cross product of two other vectors, specifically the equation $$\frac{d}{dt}[\mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{r})] = \dot{\mathbf{a}}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{r}) + {\mathbf{a}}\cdot (\dot{\mathbf{v}}\times\mathbf{r}) + \mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\dot{\mathbf{r}})$$. Participants clarify that while the derivative does not directly affect the cross product, it does influence the overall expression through the product rule. The discussion emphasizes the importance of context in interpreting the variables, particularly that $\dot{\mathbf{v}}$ represents acceleration and $\dot{\mathbf{r}}$ represents velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus
  • Familiarity with the product rule in differentiation
  • Knowledge of cross products and dot products
  • Basic concepts of kinematics, specifically velocity and acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the product rule in vector calculus
  • Learn about the properties of cross products and their geometric interpretations
  • Explore the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and their derivatives in physics
  • Investigate applications of vector derivatives in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mathematics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus and need to understand the differentiation of vector products.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
$$
\frac{d}{dt}[\mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{r})] = \dot{\mathbf{a}}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{r}).
$$
How is this true? Shouldn't the derivative affect the cross product as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
$$
\frac{d}{dt}[\mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{r})] = \dot{\mathbf{a}}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{r}).
$$
How is this true? Shouldn't the derivative affect the cross product as well?

The formula is

$
\dfrac{d}{dt}[\mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{r})] = \dot{\mathbf{a}}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{r})+{\mathbf{a}}\cdot (\dot{\mathbf{v}}\times\mathbf{r})+\mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\dot{\mathbf{r}})
$
 
Fernando Revilla said:
The formula is

$
\dfrac{d}{dt}[\mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{r})] = \dot{\mathbf{a}}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{r})+{\mathbf{a}}\cdot (\dot{\mathbf{v}}\times\mathbf{r})+\mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times\dot{\mathbf{r}})
$

But since $\dot{\mathbf{v}}=\mathbf{a}$ and $\dot{\mathbf{r}}=\mathbf{v}$, you get...
 
Ackbach said:
But since $\dot{\mathbf{v}}=\mathbf{a}$ and $\dot{\mathbf{r}}=\mathbf{v}$, you get...

Well, I don't suppose $\mathbf{a}$ means acceleration, etc in the same way that I don't suppose that a matrix $U\in\mathbb{C}^{n\times n}$ is a unitary matrix. :)
 
Fernando Revilla said:
Well, I don't suppose $\mathbf{a}$ means acceleration, etc in the same way that I don't suppose that a matrix $U\in\mathbb{C}^{n\times n}$ is a unitary matrix. :)

Well, certainly not a priori. I'm guessing that there's some context for this problem, and that in that context, the equations I wrote before are true. It was a guess. Think of it as thinking more like a physicist than a mathematician. (Evilgrin)
 
a is acceleration and v is velocity.
 
v cross v is zero but why is a cross r zero?
 
dwsmith said:
v cross v is zero but why is a cross r zero?

It isn't. But the result is perpendicular to $\mathbf{a}$, so when you do the outer dot product...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
838
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K