Derivative in an abstract polynomial ring

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivative defined in an abstract polynomial ring R[X], specifically the operator D that maps polynomials to their derivatives. Key properties of D are established, including linearity (D[f+g]=D[f]+D[g]) and the Leibniz rule for derivatives of products (D[f(X)g(X)]=D[f(X)]g(X)+f(X)D[g(X)]). The user successfully demonstrates parts (a) and (b) of the homework problem but seeks clarification on part (c), which involves applying the previously established results to prove the Leibniz rule for arbitrary polynomials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of abstract algebra concepts, particularly rings and polynomial rings.
  • Familiarity with the definition and properties of derivatives in calculus.
  • Knowledge of the Leibniz rule for differentiation.
  • Ability to manipulate summations and polynomial expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of derivatives in abstract algebra, focusing on polynomial rings.
  • Learn about the Leibniz rule in more depth and its applications in various mathematical contexts.
  • Practice proving properties of derivatives using examples from abstract algebra.
  • Explore the implications of linearity in differentiation for more complex algebraic structures.
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, mathematicians interested in polynomial derivatives, and educators teaching calculus concepts in a broader algebraic context.

PingPong
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
"Derivative" in an abstract polynomial ring

Homework Statement


Let R be any ring and define D:R[X]-->R[X] by setting D[\sum a_nX^n]=\sum na_nX^{n-1}.

a) Check that, if f(X)=\sum a_nX^n and g(X)=\sum b_nX^n, then D[f+g]=D[f]+D[g]
b) Check that D[a_ib_jX^{i+j}]=D[a_iX^i]b_jX^j+a_iX^iD[b_jX^j]
c) Now using the additivity in a), show that D[f(X)g(X)]=D[f(X)]g(X)+f(X)D[g(X)] for all polynomials f and g in R.

Homework Equations


None.

The Attempt at a Solution


I see the clear parallel to polynomial derivatives, but it's not defined in terms of epsilons and deltas - it's just a "black box" function that really has no meaning. But in any case, I've been able to get parts (a) and (b) without any problems. But I'm having trouble with (c).

I've chosen to write the product of f(X)=\sum_i a_iX^i and g(X)=\sum_j b_jX^j as just \sum_{i,j}a_ib_jX^{i+j} so that it's similar to the result of part (b). Then
D[f(X)g(X)]=D[\sum_{i,j}a_ib_jX^{i+j}]=\sum_{i,j} D[a_ib_jX^{i+j}]=\sum_{i,j} \left(D[a_iX^i]b_jX^j+a_iX^iD[b_jX^j]\right)
=\sum_{i,j}D[a_iX^i]b_jX^j+\sum_{i,j}a_iX^iD[b_jX^j]=D[f(X)]g(X)+f(X)D[g(X)].

So does this work? I tried it another way by checking what's in the nth position on each side of the equation and showing them to be equal, but got bogged down in keeping track of indexes and stuff. My algebra professor said there was an easier way - is this it?

Thanks for your help in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
About all you really did there is restate, without really quite proving, part b). But if you actually did do part a) and b), then you are a pretty good shape. a) shows that the Leibniz rule (a common name for what you are trying to prove) is linear over sums. b) shows that it's true for products of monomials. That makes c) easy. f(X)*g(X) is really just a sum of products of monomials if you expand it out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K