##R[x,y]## and ##R[y,x]## are Ring Isomorphic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Let ##R## be a commutative ring,. Show that ##R[x,y]## is isomorphic to ##R[y,x]##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Let ##f : R[x,y] \to R[y,x]## be defined by ##\sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} a_{ij} x^i y^j \mapsto \sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} a_{ij} y^i x^j##. Verifying that ##f## is additive is rather trivial, however I am having a little trouble verifying that ##f## is multiplicative. Given ##\sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} a_{ij} x^i y^j## and ##\sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} b_{ij} x^i y^j##, what is the general form of the product? Multiplying double sums hasn't been introduced yet in my book, as far as I can tell.
 
on Phys.org
It can probably be done by the formula, which you can easily find out by a simple multiplication. It would be boring in any case. But given additivity, why not use if for polynomials ##ax^ny^m##?
 
Okay. Let me see if I follow you. Since ##\sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} a_{ij} x^i y^j## can be expanded as
$$(a_{11} xy + ... + a_{1m} xy^m) + (a_{21} x^2 y + ... + a_{2m} x^2 y^m) + ... + (a_{n1} x^n y + ... + a_{nm} x^n y^m),$$

we see that the product of it with ##\sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} b_{ij} x^i y^j## is

$$\sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} a_{ij} x^i y^j \cdot \sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} b_{ij} x^i y^j$$

$$= \bigg[(a_{11} xy + ... + a_{1m} xy^m) + (a_{21} x^2 y + ... + a_{2m} x^2 y^m) + ... + (a_{n1} x^n y + ... + a_{nm} x^n y^m) \bigg] \cdot \sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} b_{ij} x^i y^j$$

$$= (a_{11} xy \cdot \sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} b_{ij} x^i y^j+ ... + a_{1m} xy^m \cdot \sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} b_{ij} x^i y^j) + (a_{21} x^2 y \cdot \sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} b_{ij} x^i y^j+ ... + a_{2m} x^2 y^m \cdot \sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} b_{ij} x^i y^j) + ... + (a_{n1} x^n y \cdot \sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} b_{ij} x^i y^j + ... + a_{nm} x^n y^m \cdot \sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} b_{ij} x^i y^j )$$

From there I can break down each ##a_{pq} x^p y^q \cdot \sum_{i,j=1}^{n,m} b_{ij} x^i y^j## down in a similar manner, which is extraordinarily tedious, and then it suffices to show that ##f(a x^p y^q \cdot b x^n y^m) = f(a x^p y^q) f(b x^n y^m)? Does that sound right?
 
I'm not sure whether your indices are all correct, especially why you omit the constant terms. However, it isn't needed. We can simply write
$$
\left( \sum_{i,j} a_{ij} x^iy^j \right) \left( \sum_{k,l} b_{kl}x^ky^l \right) = \sum_{p,q} \left( \sum_{i+k=p}\sum_{j+l=q}a_{ij}b_{k,l}\right) x^p y^q
$$
This form has the advantage that we don't need to bother constant terms or degrees. The only question is, what does this mean, if we swap ##x## and ##y## on the left and on the right? Here you need additivity and a result for products ##c_{pq}x^py^q##.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K